[2014] FWCA 1482 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
(AG2014/336)
AMWU AND THE I C STAINLESS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING WORKSHOP AGREEMENT 2011
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY | MELBOURNE, 3 MARCH 2014 |
Application for approval of the AMWU and the I C Stainless Collective Bargaining Workshop Agreement 2011.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AMWU and the I C Stainless Collective Bargaining Workshop Agreement 2011 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The AMWU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 3 March 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 10 March 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2014.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE407102 PR548281>
- AGLC
- “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) [2014] FWCA 1482
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1482
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The commission considered the relevant statutory provisions and examined the content of the agreement to determine if it was fair and reasonable. The commission noted that the agreement contained standard provisions regarding wages, working hours, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions, which appeared to be in line with industry norms. The union argued that the agreement was the result of genuine collective bargaining and was reflective of the needs of the employees and the business. The commission also considered the absence of any adverse submissions from other parties or stakeholders, which indicated the agreement’s acceptability. After reviewing the agreement and the arguments presented, the commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, meeting all necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Fair Work Commission approved the I C Stainless Collective Bargaining Workshop Agreement 2011, finding it to be fair and reasonable. The commission’s decision was based on the comprehensive nature of the agreement, the process of collective bargaining, and the lack of adverse submissions. The approval ensures that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement are legally binding and enforceable. This outcome provides clarity and certainty for the employees and employers within the I C Stainless industry, facilitating a stable and fair working environment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.