Automatic Fire Protection and Design Pty Ltd

[2014] FWCA 3785

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Automatic Fire Protection and Design Pty Ltd
(AG2014/6007)

AUTOMATIC FIRE PROTECTION AND DESIGN FIRE ALARMS SERVICE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Manufacturing and associated industries
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE	SYDNEY, 6 JUNE 2014

Application for approval of the Automatic Fire Protection and Design Fire Alarms Service Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Automatic Fire Protection and Design Fire Alarms Service Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Automatic Fire Protection and Design Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Agreement was not lodged within 14 days after it was made. The Applicant has provided an explanation which I have found to be satisfactory. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) I consider it fair to extend the time for making this application to 9 May 2014.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s54 of the Act, will operate from 13 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 November 2017.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent case of Automatic Fire Protection and Design Pty Ltd, the Fair Work Commission was called upon to approve an enterprise agreement between the employer and its employees. The application for approval was made by the employer, seeking to formalise terms and conditions of employment under the Fire Alarms Service Enterprise Agreement 2014. The primary dispute centred on whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval, including compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it provided for fair and equitable terms for the employees.

The legal issues that the Fair Work Commission had to determine included whether the agreement covered all necessary aspects required by the Fair Work Act, such as minimum rates of pay, maximum weekly hours, and other conditions of employment. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement had been fairly negotiated and whether it provided for genuine improvements in the employees' terms and conditions. Furthermore, the Commission needed to confirm that the agreement met the requirements for a simple or certified agreement, including whether it had been properly certified by an authorised bargaining representative.

Upon review, the Fair Work Commission found that the Fire Alarms Service Enterprise Agreement 2014 met the necessary legal requirements for approval. The Commission confirmed that the agreement provided for minimum rates of pay and other essential terms that complied with the Fair Work Act. The Commission also determined that the agreement had been fairly negotiated and certified by an authorised bargaining representative. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, acknowledging that it provided for fair and equitable terms for the employees. As a result, the agreement was registered, formalising the terms and conditions of employment for the employees under the specified agreement.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established