| [2016] FWCA 3263 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Auswest Timbers Pty Ltd T/A Auswest Timbers
(AG2016/919)
AUSWEST TIMBERS P/L ORBOST PROCESSING CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Timber and paper products industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 23 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Auswest Timbers P/L Orbost Processing Centre Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Auswest Timbers P/L Orbost Processing Centre Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Auswest Timbers Pty Ltd t/a Auswest Timbers. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 23 May 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 30 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 23 May 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE419067 PR580669>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Auswest Timbers Pty Ltd T/A Auswest Timbers [2016] FWCA 3263
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3263
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements of the Act. Specifically, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, free from any coercive or oppressive conduct, and whether it provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The applicant argued that the agreement was the product of genuine negotiations and met all the statutory requirements.
Commissioner McCabe determined that the agreement did not meet the criteria for approval. The Commission found that the applicant had not established the necessary evidence of genuine negotiation, particularly concerning the terms related to overtime and penalty rates. The Commission also noted the absence of a formal meeting to discuss the agreement, which is generally expected in genuine bargaining. As a result, the Commission concluded that the agreement did not comply with the statutory requirements for approval. Consequently, the application was dismissed.
No further orders were made by the Commission beyond the dismissal of the application for approval of the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.