Australian Workers' Union v The Trustee for Box Hill Cemetery Trust T/A Box Hill Public Cemetery

Case [2024] FWC 1026


[2024] FWC 1026

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

The Trustee For Box Hill Cemetery Trust T/A Box Hill Public Cemetery

(B2024/450)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 18 APRIL 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of The Trustee for Box Hill Cemetery Trust

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of The Trustee For Box Hill Cemetery Trust T/A Box Hill Public Cemetery (Box Hill Public Cemetery or Employer).

  1. On 17 April 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Steven Bonica, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Box Hill Public Cemetery, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 31 May 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR773669.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, thirty (30) working days from the date of the Order, which is the period required by the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct a ballot.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR773668>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v The Trustee for Box Hill Cemetery Trust T/A Box Hill Public Cemetery [2024] FWC 1026
Case
[2024] FWC 1026
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers' Union (AWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order concerning employees of The Trustee for Box Hill Cemetery Trust T/A Box Hill Public Cemetery. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The employer did not oppose the application, leading to the Commission deciding to determine the matter without a hearing. The AWU had to demonstrate that it had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the employer and that all conditions for a ballot were satisfied.

The Commission had to decide whether the AWU met the requirements for a ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act. This involved verifying the notification time for the proposed agreement and ensuring all prerequisites under section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled. The Commission also needed to determine the closing date for the ballot, which was set at 31 May 2024 to allow the Australian Electoral Commission sufficient time to conduct the ballot. Furthermore, the Commission had to assign the matter for a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act, with an order requiring the attendance of bargaining representatives.

The Deputy President found that the AWU had met the necessary requirements for a ballot order, as evidenced by the declaration of Steven Bonica, the Organiser of the AWU. The President confirmed the closing date for the ballot as 31 May 2024 and assigned the matter for a compulsory conciliation conference. An order was issued separately in PR773669, and the matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the conference. Directions were likely to be issued to ensure the parties were prepared for meaningful negotiations at the conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.