Australian Workers' Union v InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd T/A InfraBuild Mesh

Case [2025] FWC 1942


[2025] FWC 1942

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v
InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd T/A InfraBuild Mesh

(B2025/1093)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 7 JULY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd T/A InfraBuild Mesh

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd trading as InfraBuild Mesh (InfraBuild Mesh or Employer).

  1. I note that the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.[1]

  1. On 7 July 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer had safety related concerns with six of the proposed questions set out in clause 5 of the proposed order, and that one of the proposed questions lacked specificity. The Respondent also sought to clarify the correct employer entity that would be subject to the Order.

  1. The AWU subsequently agreed to amend questions 15, 16, 17, 18, 21 and 22 of clause 5 to include ‘safety exemptions’ and it also amended question 11 to increase its specificity.

  1. I observe that the parties also agreed for the AWU to give the following undertaking as part of the subsequent notification of protected industrial action to the Employer:

The AWU undertakes to ensure that during any period of Industrial action, members will be available to perform work in genuine emergencies where there is a risk to health/safety.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to amend the application to adopt the revised ballot questions in addition to naming the correct employer and otherwise determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  2. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of James Downie, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with InfraBuild Mesh, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 21 July 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. To the extent that InfraBuild Mesh sought that the undertaking referenced earlier be included in the Order to be made by the Commission, I observe that whilst the Commission may accommodate agreed arrangements reached between the parties, there is very limited, if any, scope for the Commission to require any undertakings of this kind.[3] Further, unless they form part of the ballot questions, which must state the question to be put to the employees including the nature of the proposed action,[4] the provisions of s.443 of the Act do not appear to otherwise extend to include such express terms in an order of this kind.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR788977.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1097.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

[3] See also Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Derwent Valley Council[2025] FWC 1916 at [20] and [21].

[4] Section 443(3)(d) of the Act.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788978>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd T/A InfraBuild Mesh [2025] FWC 1942
Case
[2025] FWC 1942
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission under the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd trading as InfraBuild Mesh (InfraBuild Mesh). The application related to a proposed enterprise agreement, which had been the subject of negotiations between the AWU and InfraBuild Mesh. InfraBuild Mesh raised concerns about certain proposed ballot questions, including issues of safety and specificity. The AWU subsequently amended the proposed questions to address these concerns.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the AWU had met all the requirements of section 443 of the Act for the application, including the provision of a notification time, and whether the proposed ballot questions were appropriate. The Commission also considered whether it could include an undertaking by the AWU, related to the availability of members during industrial action in genuine emergencies, in the order. InfraBuild Mesh also sought clarification of the correct employer entity to be subject to the order.

The Commission determined that the AWU had met all the requirements for the application, including the provision of a notification time, and that the revised ballot questions were acceptable. The Commission noted that it had limited scope to require undertakings from parties in such an order unless they formed part of the ballot questions. The Commission also identified the correct employer entity and determined the ballot period to be 10 working days from the making of the order. The Commission decided to issue a separate order for the compulsory conciliation conference, to be conducted by another Member of the Commission.

The Fair Work Commission issued an order granting the AWU's application for a protected action ballot order, with the revised ballot questions and the correct employer entity identified. The Commission also determined the ballot period to be 10 working days from the making of the order. The Commission issued a separate order for the compulsory conciliation conference, to be conducted by another Member of the Commission.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.