Australian Workers' Union v Hy-Tec Industries Victoria Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 3114


[2025] FWC 3114

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot

Australian Workers' Union

v

Hy-Tec Industries Victoria Pty Ltd

(B2025/1592)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT

SYDNEY, 17 OCTOBER 2025

Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2025/1414.

  1. This matter concerns the declaration of the result of a protected action ballot PR791588 held in matter B2025/1414 and declared on 23 September 2025.

  1. The Australian Workers' Union has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by the relevant protected action ballot.

  1. Section 459(3) of the Act provides as follows:

“(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:

(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and

(b)     the period has not previously been extended.”

  1. The application contends that each of the relevant requirements have been met and that the period should be extended by a further 30 days from the expiry of the original 30 days.

  1. Hy-Tec Industries Victoria Pty Ltd has advised the Commission it has no objection to this application.

  1. I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.

  1. Accordingly, pursuant to section 459(3) of the Act, I order that the 30 day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer be extended by a further 30 days.

  1. This order will operate on and from 23 October 2025.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR792741>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v Hy-Tec Industries Victoria Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 3114
Case
[2025] FWC 3114
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers' Union has applied to the Fair Work Commission for an extension of the 30-day period in which industrial action can be authorised by a protected action ballot held for employees of Hy-Tec Industries Victoria Pty Ltd. The matter concerns the declaration of the results of a ballot held on 23 September 2025, and the application seeks to extend this period by a further 30 days in accordance with section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009. Hy-Tec Industries Victoria Pty Ltd has stated that it has no objection to the application.

The central legal issue before the Fair Work Commission was whether the application met the statutory criteria for extending the 30-day period. The criteria under section 459(3) of the Act include that an application has been made to the Commission for the period to be extended and that the period has not previously been extended. The Deputy President concluded that the requirements of the Act were satisfied and that the application should be granted. The Deputy President noted that Hy-Tec Industries Victoria Pty Ltd had no objections to the application.

The Deputy President granted the application and extended the 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer by a further 30 days. This order will operate from 23 October 2025. The Fair Work Commission determined that the application met the statutory criteria for an extension and that the application should be granted in the absence of any objections from Hy-Tec Industries Victoria Pty Ltd.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.