Australian Workers' Union v Contract Resources Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 2951


[2024] FWC 2951

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

Contract Resources Pty Ltd

(B2024/1385)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 24 OCTOBER 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Contract Resources Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Contract Resources Pty Ltd (CR or Employer).

  1. On 24 October 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application, as amended following discussions between the parties.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of James Downie, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with CR, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 13 November 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I observe that the Parties agreed for the AWU to provide an undertaking relating to general safety exemptions, which has been added to the Order.

  1. The structure of the draft order has been amended to reflect the Fair Work Commission’s standard template.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended minimum period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of four (4) working days applies to the items listed within clause five of the Order. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR780551.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 14 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR780552>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v Contract Resources Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 2951
Case
[2024] FWC 2951
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, concerning certain employees of Contract Resources Pty Ltd (CR). The matter was presented by Deputy President Hampton in Adelaide on 24 October 2024. The employer did not object to the application after discussions between the parties, leading to the decision to proceed without a hearing. The AWU argued that it had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with CR and had fulfilled all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act.

The legal issues before the court included whether the AWU had satisfied the requirements of the Fair Work Act to hold a protected action ballot, and if the proposed ballot period was reasonable. The court had to determine if the AWU had genuinely attempted to negotiate with CR and if the proposed ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), was eligible. Additionally, the court needed to consider if there were exceptional circumstances that justified extending the minimum period of written notice for industrial action.

Deputy President Hampton determined that the AWU had met the requirements for a protected action ballot and that CiVS was eligible to conduct the ballot. The court set the voting closure date for 13 November 2024, effectively extending the ballot period to 14 working days from the making of the order. The court also acknowledged the agreement on general safety exemptions and adjusted the draft order to reflect the Fair Work Commission’s standard template. The extended notice period of four working days applied to specific items within the order. Another Commission member will conduct the compulsory conciliation conference, and directions will be issued to ensure meaningful negotiations.

The Fair Work Commission issued an order allowing the AWU to proceed with the ballot, setting the voting closure date and confirming the eligibility of CiVS as the ballot agent. The extended notice period for industrial action was also approved, and the matter was assigned to another Commission member for conciliation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.