| [2025] FWC 868 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Workers' Union
v
BlueScope Steel Limited
(B2025/516)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 27 MARCH 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of BlueScope Steel Limited
This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of BlueScope Steel Limited (BlueScope or Employer).
On 27 March 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application. I observe that BlueScope raised certain issues for future reference that did not directly concern the statutory requirements for the making of the proposed order.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Patrick Reilly, Lead Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with BlueScope, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 10 April 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR785609.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR785610>
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union v BlueScope Steel Limited [2025] FWC 868
- Case
- [2025] FWC 868
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues for the Court were whether the AWU had genuinely been trying to reach an agreement with BlueScope and whether all statutory requirements for the making of the proposed order had been met. The AWU had to demonstrate that there was a notification period for the proposed agreement and that all the requirements in section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled. Additionally, it was necessary to ensure that the ballot would be conducted by an approved agent, Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, who was authorised to conduct the ballot under section 468A of the Act.
After reviewing the material, including the declaration by Patrick Reilly, the Lead Industrial Officer, who confirmed the AWU's efforts in bargaining with BlueScope, Deputy President Hampton found that the AWU had genuinely been trying to reach an agreement and that all requirements for the order had been met. The Deputy President determined that the voting for the ballot would close on 10 April 2025, which also established the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference, with an order to be issued to ensure that the parties are ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
In conclusion, the Fair Work Commission granted the AWU's application for a protected action ballot order. The Deputy President set the closing date for the voting at 10 April 2025 and directed that the matter proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference to facilitate negotiations between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.