Australian Workers' Union, The v Orica Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 659


[2023] FWC 659

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Australian Workers’ Union, The
v

Orica Australia Pty Ltd

(B2023/255)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 20 MARCH 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Orica Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Orica Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent).

  1. On 20 March 2023, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of David Joseph Swan of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVS has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVS has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

  1. Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.

An order has been separately issued in PR760422

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR760421>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union, The v Orica Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 659
Case
[2023] FWC 659
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) has lodged an application with the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The AWU seeks to conduct a protected action ballot for certain employees of Orica Australia Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission, led by Deputy President Clancy, convened in Melbourne on 20 March 2023 to consider the application. Notably, Orica Australia Pty Ltd did not oppose the application, allowing the Deputy President to decide on the matter based on the presented documents.

The legal issues at hand involved determining whether the notification time for the proposed agreement was met and if the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act were satisfied. The AWU had to demonstrate that it had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with Orica Australia Pty Ltd. Furthermore, the AWU requested that Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, trading as CiVS, be appointed as the ballot agent instead of the Australian Electoral Commission. This request was also unopposed by Orica Australia Pty Ltd. The Deputy President assessed the suitability of CiVS, considering the statutory declaration provided by the Managing Director, Mr Michael M Michael, which confirmed his experience and the company's capability to ensure the secrecy and security of the votes.

The Deputy President found that the notification time for the proposed agreement was indeed met, and all requirements under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act were satisfied. The AWU was deemed to be genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with Orica Australia Pty Ltd. Additionally, CiVS was deemed a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. Consequently, the Deputy President appointed CiVS as the protected action ballot agent, and an order was issued accordingly. Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 regarding the handling of information relating to the protected action ballot.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.