| [2023] FWC 2395 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Workers' Union, The
v
Austube Mills Pty Ltd T/A Austube Mills
(B2023/990)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 18 SEPTEMBER 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Austube Mills Pty Ltd trading as Austube Mills
This is an application by the Australian Workers' Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Austube Mills Pty Ltd T/A Austube Mills (Austube Mills or Employer).
I observe that there are related applications by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) [1] and Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU).[2] Both applications relate to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 18 September 2023, the Commission was advised that Austube Mills did not, in effect, object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr John Boyd, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Austube Mills, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[3] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 3 October 2023. [4]This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR766307.
This matter will be assigned to a Commission Member to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, the Commission will also issue the Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2023/984.
[2] B2023/985.
[3] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400.
[4] This is, in effect, ten working days from the date of effect of the order, as sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR766308>
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union, The v Austube Mills Pty Ltd T/A Austube Mills [2023] FWC 2395
- Case
- [2023] FWC 2395
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to address included whether the notification time for the proposed agreement had been met and whether all the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been fulfilled. The court also needed to determine the closing date for voting to ensure compliance with section 443(3)(c) of the Act. Additionally, the court had to confirm the eligibility of Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS) as a ballot agent under section 468A of the Act.
Deputy President Hampton found that the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Austube Mills and that all the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met. The court was satisfied with the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the employer and approved the use of CiVS as the ballot agent. The Deputy President set the closing date for voting as 3 October 2023, establishing the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter will be assigned to a Commission Member for a compulsory conciliation conference, along with related matters, to ensure meaningful negotiations between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.