Australian Utilities Management Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 6368


[2013] FWCA 6368

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Australian Utilities Management Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2280)

AUSTRALIAN UTILITIES MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2016

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER MACDONALD

SYDNEY, 6 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Australian Utilities Management Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Australian Utilities Management Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The application has been made by Australian Utilities Management Pty Ltd (“the applicant”). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 relevant to this application for approval has been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date is 13 September 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code {G}, AE403599  PR541026>

Details
AGLC
Australian Utilities Management Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 6368
Case
[2013] FWCA 6368
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved Australian Utilities Management Pty Ltd and its employees, represented by the National Electrical and Communications Association. The dispute centred around the application for approval of the Australian Utilities Management Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016. The Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for the appropriate minimum terms and conditions of employment, whether it was free from prohibited content, and whether it was made in good faith and without coercion. Furthermore, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement contained terms that were reasonably necessary to protect the health and safety of employees.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement substantially complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission acknowledged the efforts made by both parties to reach a negotiated agreement and determined that the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable. The agreement was approved, with some minor modifications to ensure it met all legal requirements, particularly those relating to the protection of employee health and safety. The decision underscored the importance of negotiated agreements in promoting harmonious workplace relations.

The final orders included the approval of the enterprise agreement with the stipulated modifications, thereby resolving the dispute and providing a framework for the employment conditions of the employees covered by the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.