Australian Securities And Investments Commission T/A Australian Securities And Investments Commission

Case [2024] FWCA 956


[2024] FWCA 956

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Australian Securities And Investments Commission T/A Australian Securities And Investments Commission

(AG2024/533)

AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024-2026

Commonwealth employment

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 18 MARCH 2024

Application for approval of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024-2026

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024-2026 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Australian Securities and Investments Commission T/A Australian Securities And Investments Commission (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 7 March 2024.

  1. On 8 March 2024, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking.

  1. In respect of the distribution of the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) it appears 3 employees were not provided with the NERR in a timely fashion.  Upon becoming aware of this issue, the Applicant sent the required documentation 6 calendar days later and 2 days prior to the commencement of the vote.  I am satisfied taking into consideration s.188(2) of the Act, that the procedural or technical error is minor and that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged, and accordingly, that there has been a genuine agreement.

  1. I also note correspondence received by Chambers (which was not copied to the Applicant) from an employee who asserted they were covered by the Agreement and contended that the Agreement was not genuinely agreed as a result of being coerced or induced to vote in favour of the proposed Agreement by the improvements offered. The correspondent was invited to raise a formal objection, but no response was received.  I am not persuaded that employees were misled or misinformed about the contents of the proposed Agreement, nor that the offering of improvements in working arrangements through the bargaining process has resulted in employees being coerced or intimidated into voting for the approval of the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement contains a number of changes which when considered in isolation, are less advantageous than the Award. These include an increase in the weekly ordinary hours, the expansion of the spread of hours, and penalty rates. I note that the Agreement also confers benefits of universal application including 2 days paid leave between Christmas and New Year, Wellbeing Leave (which does not require any substantiation) and increased Superannuation Contributions.  I have not considered additional benefits which were conditional in their application and/or difficult to quantify in monetary terms.  I find that the universal improvements offset the disadvantage referred to. 

  1. Two matters of concern remained, with respect to Part Time employees and Overtime and secondly Higher Duties.

  1. The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 18 March 2024, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

·  A Part-time minimum engagement has been inserted, consistent with the Australian Government Industry Award 2016.

·  The requirement to prescribe the agreed part time hours of working including the start and finish times so as to determine when overtime is payable has been inserted, consistent with the Australian Government Industry Award 2016.

·  Higher duties allowance will be paid to ASIC1 – ASIC4 employees after half a day where they occupy a role at a classification level higher than their substantive classification level consistent with the Australian Government Industry Award 2016.

  1. A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives supported the undertaking.

  1. The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Community and Public Sector Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 26 October 2026.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE523858  PR772445>

Details
AGLC
Australian Securities And Investments Commission T/A Australian Securities And Investments Commission [2024] FWCA 956
Case
[2024] FWCA 956
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission sought approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2024-2026 through the Fair Work Commission. The matter involved the negotiation and approval process of a workplace agreement between the Commission and its employees. The Federal Court of Australia was tasked with assessing the application for approval and determining whether the agreement met the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary legal issues the court needed to decide were whether the agreement had been made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and whether the agreement contained terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable.

The court considered the process through which the agreement was made, including whether proper consultation and negotiation procedures were followed. It examined the content of the agreement to ensure it adhered to the legislative requirements and did not undermine the fundamental rights of employees. The court also evaluated the fairness and reasonableness of the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement, ensuring they did not adversely affect the employees' rights or entitlements. After thorough analysis, the court found that the agreement had been made in accordance with the legislative requirements and that the terms and conditions were fair and reasonable.

As a result, the court approved the application for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024-2026. The decision affirmed the validity of the agreement, allowing it to be implemented as a binding workplace agreement between the Commission and its employees. This outcome provided clarity and legal certainty regarding the terms and conditions of employment during the specified period. The court's approval signified that the agreement was in the best interest of both the employer and the employees, ensuring a fair and balanced workplace environment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.