Australian Research Council Act 2001 - Linkage - Learned Academies Special Projects - Funding Rules for Funding Commencing in 2004 (Cth)
LINKAGE—
LEARNED ACADEMIES
SPECIAL PROJECTS
Funding Rules
for funding commencing in
2004
Australian Research Council
Funding Rules for Funding Commencing in 2004
Failure to provide reports 8
Australian Research Council
Funding Rules for Funding Commencing in 2004
These schemes aim to maintain and strengthen Australia’s knowledge base and research capabilities by developing an effective research and research training system, focused on the higher education sector.
The objectives of Linkage-Learned Academies Special Projects (LASP) funding are to support projects undertaken by the Learned Academies which:
• capitalise on their unique capabilities;
• assist programs of research undertaken by institutions; and
• may be expected to have results of broad benefit for research and scholarship in the natural and applied sciences, technological development and applied technology, the social sciences and the humanities.
The Australian Research Council is particularly interested in supporting activities in areas of demonstrable national importance.
3.1 Funding
These funds are a separate component of the NCGP Budget.
4.1 Applicant eligibility
Financial assistance under the LASP program may be provided to the following organisations:
• Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering;
• Australian Academy of Science;
• Australian Academy of the Humanities;
• Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia;
• National Academies Forum (NAF).
4.2 Areas not eligible for support
Normally, funding will not be provided projects directed at specific research problems, since these are funded more appropriately through other ARC or Commonwealth Government funding programs.
4.3 Cross-scheme eligibility
There is no conflict in these two roles. Fellows may apply for the normal range of ARC research grants available to individuals (within a specified limits) even if associated with a Linkage-Learned Academies Special Projects.
Applications for Special Projects are subject to a two-phase application process.
5.1 Expressions of Interest
In the first instance each Academy may submit expressions of interest in up to four Special Projects to the ARC by
23 May 2003 . The National Academies Forum may submit up to two expressions of interest. Expressions of interest must include:
• a clear summary of the purpose of the project and its planned outcomes;
• a summary of the ways in which the project supports Government objectives and the objectives of the Academy;
• a brief outline of the activities involved in the project and its planned milestones; and
• an indicative budget which estimates how Government funds will be spent. It should show any other sources of funding for the project and how those funds will be spent, as well as any income which the Academy expects to be generated by the project.
An expression of interest should not exceed A4 three pages and must be in 12 point font size.
5.2 Application
Following an assessment of the expressions of interest, some proposals will be short-listed for further development. For these proposals the following information will be required in a full application submitted to the ARC by
18 July 2003 :
• a detailed statement of the purpose of the project, its methodology and its planned outcomes;
• a description of the ways in which the project supports Government objectives and the objectives of the Academy/Forum, and builds on previous work undertaken by the Academy/Forum or its fellows;
• a clear indication of project leader, details of the staff and resources involved in the project, including staff and resources to be used in institutions other than the host Academy/Forum;
• the curriculum vitae of key personnel involved in the project, not exceeding one page per person, including - name, qualifications and current appointment, employment history, relevant experience and other relevant information;
• a detailed timeline of the activities involved in the project and its planned milestones;
• an indication of the intellectual property issues which may arise from the project and the intention of the Academy/Forum with respect to the publication of findings; and
• a detailed budget which indicates how Government funds will be spent. It should show any other sources of funding for the project and how those funds will be spent as well as any income which the Academy/Forum expects to be generated by the project. Each activity should be assigned a priority ranking according to whether that activity is considered essential, desirable or beneficial to a successful outcome of the project, and should be justified. Funding for direct costs of administration (eg travel costs, external meeting costs, publication costs) related to the conduct of the project may be requested (and must be fully justified); general administrative overheads must be met by the host Academy/Forum.
6.1 Selection criteria
An application for Special Projects funding is assessed against the following criteria:
• it satisfies the objectives of the Scheme, as described in Section 2 of these funding rules;
• the merit of the proposal in relation to goals and potential outcomes, the project plan and budget justification;
• the relevance of the project to issues of national significance and importance; and
• if part funding is available from other sources special consideration will be given to the project.
6.2 Selection procedure
The Selection Committee:
• assesses and recommends budget; and
• prepares funding recommendations that are submitted to the ARC for Board and then to the Minister for approval.
Short listing of a project does not guarantee that the project will subsequently be funded.
The Academy is not obliged to accept amendments, but the ARC may decline to endorse a proposal for funding if amendments are not made.
6.3 Offer of grant
The grant offer must be accepted in writing (as per the Funding Agreement) before payment can be made.
The Funding Approval may be varied where any of the circumstances described in s.55 (3) of the
(a) the organisation’s involvement with the research program ends;
(b) the research program changes so that it is no longer consistent with the description in the Funding Approval;
(c) the person named in the Funding Approval as the person leading the research program ceases to lead the program; and
(d) any other such circumstances as the ARC may, in its discretion, determine.
Appeals must be made on the appeals form available on the ARC website ( form must be lodged through the institution’s research office and be received,
The Appeals Officer
Australian Research Council LC 321
GPO Box 2702
CANBERRA ACT 2601
8.1 Reporting requirements
The following report must be provided:
• End of Year Report on the project, including statement of actual expenditure of project funds at the end of each year's funding, to the ARC by 31 March of the year following the year for which the grant was provided; and• Audited Financial Statement by 30 June of the year following the grant.• Final Report on the project, within six months of the completion of the project, and expenditure of all ARC funds.
The ARC reserves the right to suspend payment of further instalments of any current grant until the appropriate reports have been received and assessed as satisfactory.
8.1.1 Failure to provide reports
In this case, the ARC may withhold the remainder of the institution’s payments under the Program for the current year or initiate recovery of grant money.
8.2 Financial management
Payment of funds will be made to institutions in regular instalments, in accordance with approved payment arrangements made under the
Carry overs beyond
31 December of the year in which the grant was made require approval which should be requested in the Annual Report due by 31 March in the year following the grant year.
If an Academy cannot spend the entire grant amount for the purposes it was given, it must show the amount to be returned in the statement of income and expenditure in the Annual Report.
9.1 Privacy of individuals
Documents containing personal information are handled and protected in accordance with the provisions of the
Persons, bodies and organisations involved in the ARC program must abide by the IPPs and the
• personal information is collected in accordance with IPPs 1-3;
• suitable storage arrangements, including appropriate filing procedures are in place;
• suitable security arrangements exist for all records containing personal information;
• access to a person’s own personal information held by the organisation is made available to the person at no charge;
• records are accurate, up-to-date, complete and not misleading;
• where a record is found to be inaccurate, the correction is made;
• where a person requests that a record be amended because it is inaccurate but the record is found to be accurate, the details of the request for amendment are noted on the record;
• the personal information is only to be used for the purposes for which it was collected, or for other purposes where expressly allowed by IPP 10; and
• personal information is only disclosed in accordance with IPP 11.
Privacy complaints can be made directly to the Federal Privacy Commissioner, but the Federal Privacy Commissioner prefers that the ARC be given an opportunity to deal with the complaint in the first instance. You can contact the Privacy Commissioner on 1300 363 992.
9.2 Confidentiality
Information contained in applications is regarded as confidential unless otherwise stated and will be received and treated as confidential by the ARC, institutions and assessors.
9.3 Intellectual property
Applicants must agree to comply with the National Principles of Intellectual Property Management for Publicly Funded Research (available at The Learned Academies should each have a policy concerning intellectual property.
9.4 Incomplete/misleading information
It is a serious offence to provide false or misleading information. If an application is incomplete or contains information which is considered misleading, it will not be considered for funding.
Examples of malpractice include, but are not restricted to:
providing fictitious track records; and
• falsifying claims in publications records (eg. describing a paper as accepted for publication when it has only been submitted).
9.5 Insurance and liabilities
Academies are responsible for taking out appropriate insurance.
9.6 Contact points
In the first instance, grantees and applicants for grants should contact their Academy if they require further information.
Enquiries and applications for funding under this Scheme should be sent to:
LASP Program Co-ordinator
Australian Research Council
GPO Box 2702
CANBERRA ACT 2601
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 02 6284 6600
Fax: 02 6684 6638
Web address
0
0
0