Australian Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union v Sydney Trains
Case
•
[2019] FWC 6693
•26 SEPTEMBER 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Australian Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union v Sydney Trains [2019] FWC 6693
[2019] FWC 6693
26 SEPTEMBER 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Australian Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union took Sydney Trains to the Fair Work Commission in response to the removal of an enclosure at Liverpool Railway Station in New South Wales. The union argued that the removal was in breach of an enterprise agreement and sought a remedy for its members affected by the change. The Commission was tasked with determining whether it had the authority to address the remedy sought by the union and, if so, what that remedy should be.
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether it possessed the jurisdiction to consider the union's request for a remedy regarding the removal of the enclosure. This hinged on interpreting the scope of the powers granted under the relevant enterprise agreement and whether the agreement provided the Commission with the authority to enforce the remedy sought by the union. The Commission also needed to determine the appropriate remedy if it found that it had the necessary jurisdiction.
The Commission concluded that it did indeed have the power to deal with the remedy sought by the union. It found that the enterprise agreement conferred upon it the authority to address such matters. In terms of the appropriate remedy, the Commission ordered Sydney Trains to reinstate the enclosure at Liverpool Railway Station. This decision was grounded in the interpretation of the enterprise agreement and the need to uphold the rights of the union's members as set out in the agreement.
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether it possessed the jurisdiction to consider the union's request for a remedy regarding the removal of the enclosure. This hinged on interpreting the scope of the powers granted under the relevant enterprise agreement and whether the agreement provided the Commission with the authority to enforce the remedy sought by the union. The Commission also needed to determine the appropriate remedy if it found that it had the necessary jurisdiction.
The Commission concluded that it did indeed have the power to deal with the remedy sought by the union. It found that the enterprise agreement conferred upon it the authority to address such matters. In terms of the appropriate remedy, the Commission ordered Sydney Trains to reinstate the enclosure at Liverpool Railway Station. This decision was grounded in the interpretation of the enterprise agreement and the need to uphold the rights of the union's members as set out in the agreement.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Collective Agreement
-
Remedies
-
Enterprise Agreement
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Australian Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union v Sydney Trains [2020] FWC 1457
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Sydney Trains
[2020] FWCFB 4178
Australian Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union v Sydney Trains
[2020] FWC 1457
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Sydney Trains
[2020] FWCFB 4178
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v ALS Industrial Australia Pty Ltd
[2015] FCAFC 123