Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v KDR Victoria Pty Ltd Trading as Yarra Trams
Case
•
[2014] FCAFC 24
•18 March 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v KDR Victoria Pty Ltd Trading as Yarra Trams [2014] FCAFC 24
[2014] FCAFC 24
18 March 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v KDR Victoria Pty Ltd Trading as Yarra Trams, the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission was tasked with resolving disputes pertaining to the interpretation of an enterprise agreement and the incorporation of the employer’s internal disciplinary policy. The Union contested the employer’s decision to dismiss an employee, asserting that the dismissal was a breach of the enterprise agreement. The employer, on the other hand, argued that the dismissal complied with the terms of their internal disciplinary policy, which they claimed was incorporated into the enterprise agreement by reference.
The central legal issues before the court involved whether the employer's internal disciplinary policy was indeed incorporated by reference into the enterprise agreement and, if so, whether the employer was mandated to conduct a specific form of inquiry as per the policy. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the failure to observe the terms of the policy constituted a breach of the certified agreement. The court also examined the relevance of custom and practice in this context.
In its reasoning, the court found that the employer's internal disciplinary policy was not incorporated by reference into the enterprise agreement. The court held that the policy did not explicitly state that it was part of the agreement and there was no evidence in the custom and practice to support such incorporation. Furthermore, the court determined that the policy did not require a particular form of inquiry, as it merely specified the procedure for making a request for inquiry and acknowledged the right of appeal to a statutory authority. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and no order was made as to costs.
The central legal issues before the court involved whether the employer's internal disciplinary policy was indeed incorporated by reference into the enterprise agreement and, if so, whether the employer was mandated to conduct a specific form of inquiry as per the policy. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the failure to observe the terms of the policy constituted a breach of the certified agreement. The court also examined the relevance of custom and practice in this context.
In its reasoning, the court found that the employer's internal disciplinary policy was not incorporated by reference into the enterprise agreement. The court held that the policy did not explicitly state that it was part of the agreement and there was no evidence in the custom and practice to support such incorporation. Furthermore, the court determined that the policy did not require a particular form of inquiry, as it merely specified the procedure for making a request for inquiry and acknowledged the right of appeal to a statutory authority. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and no order was made as to costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Industrial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Standing
-
Interpretation of Contract
-
Breach of Contract
-
Custom and Practice
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Sydney [2020] FCA 1709
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Halici v KDR Victoria Pty Ltd T/A Yarra Trams (No.3)
[2017] FCCA 764
Nalwanga (Migration)
[2020] AATA 5660
James Cook University v Ridd
[2020] FCAFC 123
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
2