| [2024] FWC 1418 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union
v
Central Queensland Services Pty Ltd T/A BMA
(B2024/710)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 30 MAY 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Central Queensland Services Pty Ltd.
This is an application by the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (ARTBIU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Central Queensland Services Pty Ltd T/A BMA (BMA or Employer).
I note that the Australian Federated Union of Locomotive Employees (AFULE) and the Mining and Energy Union (MEU)[1] have each made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 29 May 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Craig Allen, Lead and Central Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the ARTBIU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with it, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 11 July 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR775497.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2024/696, B2024/702, respectively.
[2] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, as required by the AEC.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR775498>
- AGLC
- Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Central Queensland Services Pty Ltd T/A BMA [2024] FWC 1418
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1418
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission needed to decide if the ARTBIU met all the requirements for a protected action ballot order under section 443(1) of the Act. This included verifying that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the Employer and that the notification time for the proposed agreement was met. The Deputy President Hampton was satisfied with the information provided, including the declaration from Craig Allen, Lead and Central Organiser of ARTBIU, confirming the union's efforts to bargain with BMA.
After considering the material, Deputy President Hampton determined that the ballot would be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC). The closing date for voting was set at 11 July 2024, which also established the ballot period for section 448A(2) of the Act. This decision was made in effect 30 working days from the issuance of the order, as required by the AEC. The matter was assigned to another member of the Commission to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference with the other related matters, ensuring all bargaining representatives attended ready for meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.