Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union

Case

[2016] FWC 3911

17 JUNE 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWC 3911
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot

Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union
(B2016/624)

Rail industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 17 JUNE 2016

Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2015/511 - extension granted.

[1] On 14 June 2016, the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (the ‘Union’) made an application, pursuant to s 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’) to extend the period in which certain industrial action may be taken in respect of the protected action ballot order made by the Commission, as presently constituted, on 11 May 2016 [PR580235] for a further 30 days. The respondent employer is Transdev Sydney Pty Ltd t/as Transdev Sydney Operators of Sydney Light Rail.

[2] The provisions governing the grant of such an extension are set out in s 459 of the Act as follows:

    459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot

    (1) Industrial action by employees is authorised by a protected action ballot if:

      (a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and

      (b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot; and

      (c) more than 50% of the valid votes were votes approving the action; and

      (d) the action commences:

        (i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or

        (ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.

    (2) If:

      (a) the nature of the proposed industrial action specified in the question or questions put to the employees in the protected action ballot included periods of industrial action of a particular duration; and

      (b) the question or questions did not specify that consecutive periods of that industrial action may be organised or engaged in;
      then only the first period in a series of consecutive periods of that industrial action is the subject of the ballot for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a).

    (3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:

      (a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and

      (b) the period has not previously been extended.’

[3] On 15 June 2016, Ms E Clements for the respondent advised my Chambers that the respondent did not formally object to the application being granted. The Order has not previously been extended. I am satisfied that the two factual preconditions set out in s 459(3) have been met. There are no discretionary reasons why the application should not be granted.

[4] Accordingly, I will order that the 30 day period which ends on 1 July 2016 be extended by a further thirty days. An order to that effect will be issued contemporaneously with this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR581712 >

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0