Australian Racing Drivers' Club v Office of Sport

Case [2021] NSWCATAD 343


Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Australian Racing Drivers’ Club v Office of Sport [2021] NSWCATAD 343
Hearing dates: 2, 3 February, 22, 23 April, 2,5 August 2021
Date of orders: 16 November 2021
Decision date: 16 November 2021
Jurisdiction:Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division
Before: S Leal, Senior Member
Decision:

The decision of the Minister of Sport dated 11 August 2020 is affirmed.

Catchwords:

LICENSING - motorsports competition – motor vehicle racing grounds - sanctioning bodies - variation of licence conditions sought – competitors under the age of sixteen years.

Legislation Cited:

Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013

Competition Policy Reform (NSW) Act 1997

Interpretation Act 1987

Motor Vehicle Sports (Public Safety) Act 1985

Motor Vehicle Sports (Public Safety) Regulation 2015

Sport Integrity Australia Act 2020

Sport Integrity Australia Regulations 2020

Cases Cited:

Shaw v Oakdale Junior Motorcycle Club Inc [2020] NSWSC 180

Texts Cited:

Review of the Motor Vehicle (Public Safety) Act 1985 Consultation Paper

Review of the Motor Vehicle (Public Safety) Act 1985 Discussion Paper

Category:Principal judgment
Parties:

Australian Racing Drivers’ Club Ltd (Applicant)

NSW Government Office of Sport (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
N Orow (Applicant)
H El Hage (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Marshalls Dent Wilmoth (Applicant)
Office of Sport (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/00262246

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

  1. The Australian Racing Drivers’ Club Ltd is a public company limited by guarantee. It operates the motor vehicle racing ground located at Eastern Creek, known as Sydney Motorsport Park, which is owned by the Western Sydney Parklands Trust. Before motorsport events can take place at Sydney Motorsport Park, the Minister for Sport must issue a licence for the racing ground. In 2020, the Australian Racing Drivers’ Club was granted such a licence subject to (amongst others) the following conditions:

  1. Condition 36 which provides as follows:

Condition 36(a) - Motor vehicle race meetings held under a permit issued by Confederation of Australian Motor Sport Ltd – trading as Motorsport Australia must be conducted in accordance with the conditions, rules and regulations of Confederation of Australian Motor Sport Ltd – trading as Motorsport Australia.

Condition 36(b) – Motor vehicle race meetings held under a permit issued by Motorcycling NSW Ltd must be conducted in accordance with the conditions, rules and regulations of Motorcycling NSW Ltd.

Condition 36(c) – Motor vehicle race meetings not held in accordance with Condition No 36(a) or (b) must be conducted to the safety and officiating standards, and in accordance with the conditions, rules and regulations, of the controlling/sanctioning organisations for the sport.

  1. Condition 37 which provides as follows:

The licensee must ensure that no person under 16 years of age is a competitor, participant, mechanic or member of the crew of a vehicle at a meeting for motor vehicle racing held at the ground unless the race is held in accordance with Condition no 36(a) or (b).

  1. On internal review, the Australian Racing Drivers’ Club sought the following variation of this decision: that condition 36(a) of its motor vehicle…

Continue reading Australian Racing Drivers' Club v Office of Sport

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Australian Racing Drivers' Club v Office of Sport [2021] NSWCATAD 343
Case
[2021] NSWCATAD 343
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Racing Drivers' Club sought a review of a decision by the Office of Sport, which had varied the terms of its licence to prohibit competitors under the age of sixteen from participating in motor vehicle racing events held on its licensed premises. The Office of Sport had made the variation on the basis that it was necessary to protect the safety of young people who compete in motorsport events. The dispute was heard by the Federal Court of Australia, with the Club contending that the variation was inconsistent with its licence and beyond the powers of the Office of Sport. The court was required to determine whether the Office of Sport had the authority to vary the licence terms and, if so, whether the variation was justified. The court found that the Office of Sport had the power to vary the terms of the licence to ensure the safety of participants. The court held that the variation was necessary to address the risks associated with young people participating in high-risk motorsport events, and was therefore within the Office of Sport's powers. The court further held that the Office of Sport had acted reasonably in making the variation, and that the variation was not inconsistent with the licence. The Federal Court affirmed the decision of the Office of Sport, upholding the variation of the licence terms to prohibit competitors under the age of sixteen from participating in motor vehicle racing events held on the Club's licensed premises.

Orders

Orders of the court

The decision of the Minister of Sport dated 11 August 2020 is affirmed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.