Australian Nursing Federation v Alcheringa Hospital Incorporated

Case

[2003] FCA 654

6 JUNE 2003


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Australian Nursing Federation v Alcheringa Hospital Incorporated
[2003] FCA 654

AUSTRALIAN NURSING FEDERATION AND OTHERS v  ALCHERINGA HOSPITAL INCORPORATED

V 251 of 2003

RYAN J
MELBOURNE
6 JUNE 2003


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V251 of 2003

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN NURSING FEDERATION AND OTHERS
Applicants

AND:

ALCHERINGA HOSPITAL INCORPORATED
Respondent

JUDGE:

RYAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

6 JUNE 2003

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Order of Ryan J of 16 May 2003 be vacated and in lieu thereof IT IS ORDERED:

1.THAT the applicants file and serve by 30 June 2003 any affidavit or affidavits it considers necessary in light of the respondent’s defence to assist the Court to determine the appropriate penalty and any further or other relief;

2.THAT the respondent file and serve by 21 July 2003 any affidavit or affidavits on which it intends to rely in answer to the affidavit or affidavits referred to in paragraph 1 of this Order;

3.THAT the application be set down on 30 July 2003 for trial confined to the issues of penalty and further or other relief.

Note:   Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V251 of 2003

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN NURSING FEDERATION AND OTHERS
Applicants

AND:

ALCHERINGA HOSPITAL INCORPORATED
Respondent

JUDGE:

RYAN J

DATE:

6 JUNE 2003

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. I consider that in this matter there would be utility in preserving the requirement for the respondent to file and serve a defence so that the allegations that are admitted can be identified readily and with precision.  I shall direct that, once that has been done, the applicants file and serve any affidavit or affidavits it considers necessary in light of the respondent's defence to assist the Court to determine the appropriate penalty and any further or other relief.

  2. I shall afford the respondent an opportunity to file affidavits in reply and then give directions for the application to be set down for trial, confined to the issues of penalty and further or other relief.  In the interests of minimising costs, neither side will be required to prepare contentions of fact and law.  If either side wishes to do that as an aid in the presentation of its case at the hearing, that, of course, may be done.  The liberty to apply which was reserved by my Order of the 16 May 2003 will be retained. 

  3. Accordingly, I shall order that paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9 of my Order of 16 May 2003 be vacated.  That will preserve Order 5, requiring the filing and service by 13 June of the respondent's defence to the amended statement of claim.  In lieu of paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the previous Order, it is ordered:

    1.That the applicants file and serve by 30 June 2003 any affidavit or affidavits it considers necessary, in light of the respondent's defence, to assist the Court to determine the appropriate penalty and any further or other relief.

    2.That the respondent file and serve by 21 July 2003 any affidavit or affidavits on which it intends to rely in answer to the affidavit or affidavits referred to in paragraph 1 of this Order.

    3.That the application be set down on 30 July 2003 for trial, confined to the issues of penalty and further or other relief.

    I certify that the preceding three (3)
    numbered paragraphs is a true copy
    of the Reasons for Judgment herein
    of the Honourable Justice Ryan.

    Associate:

    Dated:  6 June 2003

    Counsel for the Applicants:               Mr R M Niall

    Solicitor for the Applicants:              Ryan Carlisle Thomas

    Counsel for the Respondent:             Mr F Turner

    Solicitor for the Respondent:            Michael P Rahilly

    Date of Hearing:  6 June 2003

    Date of Judgment:  6 June 2003

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0