Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Victorian Branch

Case [2022] FWC 127


[2022] FWC 127

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.512—Right of entry

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Victorian Branch

(RE2021/1367)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022

Application for a right of entry permit for Tara Alexandra Nipe – permit previously issued - permit never received – order revoking missing permit – permit reissued.

  1. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) applied under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for the issue of a right of entry permit to its official, Ms Tara Alexandra Nipe. The Commission subsequently issued Ms Nipe a right of entry permit which will expire on 16 December 2024.

  1. Ms Nipe’s permit is one of the 37 missing entry permits referred to in decision [2022] FWC 123. As indicated in that decision, in order for Ms Nipe to hold a valid entry permit, the missing permit must be revoked and a permit must be reissued. In order to issue a permit to Ms Nipe, I need to be satisfied that she is a fit and proper person to hold a permit under the Act taking into account the permit qualification matters. The relevant statutory considerations set out in [2022] FWC 123 are adopted here and need not be repeated.

Consideration

  1. In support of its application the ANMF filed declarations by Ms Nipe and Ms Lisa Fitzpatrick, Secretary (the Declarations).

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f)

  1. According to the Declarations:

·   Ms Nipe has received appropriate training about the rights and responsibilities of a permit holder by undertaking a course of training on the subject of a federal right of entry conducted on 23 August 2021 (s.513(1)(a) of the Act));[1] 

·   Ms Nipe has never been convicted of an offence against an industrial law (s.513(1)(b) of the Act);[2]

·   Ms Nipe has never been convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, State, Territory or a foreign country, involving conduct described in s.513(1)(c) of the Act;[3]

·   Neither Ms Nipe nor any other person has been ordered to pay a penalty under this Act or any other industrial law in relation to action taken by her (s.513(1)(d) of the Act);[4]

·   Ms Nipe has not had any entry permit issued under Part 3-4 of the Act or a similar law of the Commonwealth revoked, suspended or had imposed conditions on any such permit (s.513(1)(e) of the Act);[5]

·   Ms Nipe has not had cancelled, suspended or imposed conditions on any right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes that Ms Nipe held under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(i) of the Act);[6] and

·   Ms Nipe has not been disqualified from exercising or applying for a right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(ii) of the Act).[7]

  1. I accept that the information disclosed in the Declarations concerning these matters is accurate and correct. These matters weigh in favour of a conclusion that Ms Nipe is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(g)

  1. There are no other matters of which I am aware that I consider relevant to the determination of whether Ms Nipe is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

Conclusion

  1. Pursuant to s.603 of the Act, the entry permit formerly issued to Ms Nipe by decision of the delegate is revoked with effect from the date of this decision. A revocation order is separately issued in PR737825.

  1. Taking in account the permit qualification matters, for the reasons earlier stated I am satisfied that Ms Nipe is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

  1. A permit will be reissued to Ms Nipe separately.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Form F42, Declaration by proposed permit holder dated 15 December 2021 at (a) and ACTU Certificate of Completion dated 23 August 2021

[2] Ibid at (b)

[3] Ibid at (c)

[4] Ibid at (d)

[5] Ibid at (e)

[6] Ibid at (f)

[7] Ibid at (g)

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR737715>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - Victorian Branch [2022] FWC 127
Case
[2022] FWC 127
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) sought a right of entry permit for its official, Ms Tara Alexandra Nipe, under section 512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). The Commission had previously issued a permit to Ms Nipe, but it had gone missing, necessitating the revocation of the original permit and the issuance of a new one. The case was heard by Deputy President Gostencnik of the Fair Work Commission.

The central legal issue was whether Ms Nipe met the criteria to be deemed a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit under the Act. This required consideration of various statutory qualifications as outlined in section 513(1) of the Act, including training, criminal history, and previous permit revocations. The Deputy President reviewed declarations submitted by Ms Nipe and Lisa Fitzpatrick, the Secretary of the ANMF, to assess Ms Nipe's qualifications.

Upon reviewing the declarations and considering the statutory qualifications, the Deputy President concluded that Ms Nipe was indeed a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit. The original permit issued to Ms Nipe was revoked, and a new permit was to be issued. This decision was based on the information provided in the declarations, which demonstrated Ms Nipe's appropriate training, lack of criminal convictions, and no history of permit revocations or penalties under industrial laws.

The Deputy President revoked the previously issued permit and ordered the issuance of a new permit to Ms Nipe. This new permit would be effective from the date of the decision and would expire on 16 December 2024.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.