Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Tas IVF Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 1791


[2024] FWC 1791

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation
v

Tas IVF Pty Ltd

(B2024/860)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 9 JULY 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Tas IVF Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Tas IVF Pty Ltd (Tas IVF or Employer).

  1. On 8 July 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.[1]

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Emily Shepherd, Branch Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the ANMF in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Tas IVF, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 24 July 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR776795.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] One of the ballot questions has been removed following consultation with the parties.

[2] This is, in effect, 11 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR776798>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Tas IVF Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1791
Case
[2024] FWC 1791
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) has filed an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Tas IVF Pty Ltd. The application was made to the Fair Work Commission by the ANMF, seeking to conduct a ballot for potential protected action. Tas IVF Pty Ltd did not object to the application, prompting the Deputy President to determine the matter on the submitted documents without a hearing. The proposed ballot is intended to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, which has been approved as a ballot agent under section 468A of the Act.

The legal issues before the Deputy President involved verifying if the ANMF had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Tas IVF and if all necessary requirements for a ballot under section 443(1) of the Act were met. The Deputy President reviewed the declaration from Emily Shepherd, the Branch Secretary of the ANMF, which detailed the union's bargaining efforts with Tas IVF. Based on this evidence, the Deputy President found that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement and that the notification period for the proposed agreement had been met. Consequently, the Deputy President was satisfied that the requirements for a ballot were fulfilled.

The Deputy President determined that the voting period for the ballot would close on 24 July 2024, which aligns with the 11 working days requested in the application. This decision sets the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter will be reassigned to another Commission member to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A, requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement. Directions may also be issued to ensure the parties are prepared for meaningful negotiations at the conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.