| [2021] FWC 3077 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.447—Protected action
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation
v
Moorabool Shire Council
(B2021/367)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 28 MAY 2021 |
Application for a variation of a Protected Action Ballot Order in B2021/212.
[1] This is an application by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) made under s.447 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for variation of a protected action ballot order in matter B2021/212 on 30 March 2021 (the Order), which was previously varied by an order in matter B2021/330 on 18 May 2021.
[2] The AEC’s application seeks to vary the Order to the effect that the date by which voting is to close is no later than 10 June 2021.
[3] On 27 May 2021, my Associate was advised that the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and Moorabool Shire Council do not object to the application.
[4] Section 447 of the Act sets out the circumstances in which the Fair Work Commission (Commission) may vary a protected action ballot order:
447 Variation of protected action ballot order
(1) An applicant for a protected action ballot order may apply to the FWC to vary the order.
(2) The protected action ballot agent for a protected action ballot may apply to the FWC to vary the protected action ballot order to change the date by which voting in the ballot closes.
(3) An application may be made under subsection (1) or (2):
(a) at any time before the date by which voting in the protected action ballot closes; or
(b) if the ballot has not been held before that date and the FWC consents - after that time.
(4) If an application is made under subsection (1) or (2), the FWC may vary the protected action ballot order.
[5] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
[6] On 27 May 2021 the Victorian State Government announced a compulsory lockdown in Melbourne of seven days from 11:59pm on 27 May 2021 until 11:59pm on 3 June 2021. As the AEC is unable to count ballot papers during this period, the AEC proposes to extend the date by which the ballot closes (currently 3 June 2021) to no later than 10 June 2021. This is both a sensible and necessary response.
[7] It is therefore appropriate in the circumstances for the variation to be made. Accordingly, the Order will be varied to the extent that the date by which voting is to close is no later than 10 June 2021.
[8] An order has been separately issued in PR730252.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR730255>
- AGLC
- Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Moorabool Shire Council [2021] FWC 3077
- Case
- [2021] FWC 3077
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation of the relevant sections of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the scope of the initial Protected Action Ballot Order. The key question was whether the Commission had the authority to amend the ballot order to encompass new matters not originally specified, and if such an amendment would be consistent with the principles of procedural fairness and the protection of the rights of both parties.
The Commission determined that it did have the jurisdiction to vary the ballot order to include the new rostering-related matters, given that the changes did not fundamentally alter the nature of the dispute. The decision was based on the notion that the new issues were closely related to the original dispute and that the amendment would not prejudice the rights of the Council or result in an unfair procedural advantage to the Federation. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that the ballot process remained fair and representative of the employees' concerns, while also recognising the need for flexibility in addressing evolving workplace issues. The application was therefore granted, and the Protected Action Ballot Order was varied accordingly.
The final orders included the variation of the ballot order to incorporate the new rostering-related matters, allowing the employees to vote on these issues as part of the protected action ballot. The Commission also set a new timeline for the conduct of the ballot, taking into account the need for reasonable notice and preparation for both parties. The decision underscored the importance of a balanced and fair approach in the resolution of industrial disputes, while also acknowledging the dynamic nature of workplace issues and the need for adaptive legal frameworks.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.