Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v City of Stonnington

Case [2024] FWC 3239


[2024] FWC 3239

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation
v

City of Stonnington

(B2024/1519)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 22 NOVEMBER 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of City of Stonington

  1. This is an application by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the City of Stonnington (Stonnington or Employer).

  1. On 21 November 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Madeleine Harradence, Assistant Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the ANMF in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Stonnington, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 6 December 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR781559.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR781560>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v City of Stonnington [2024] FWC 3239
Case
[2024] FWC 3239
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) applied to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order regarding certain employees of the City of Stonnington (Stonnington). Stonnington did not object to the application. The Deputy President, Clancy, decided to determine the matter based on the submitted documents without a hearing.

The legal issues before the court were whether the ANMF had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Stonnington and if all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled. The application was supported by the declaration of Madeleine Harradence, Assistant Secretary of the ANMF, who stated that the union had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement and that there was a notification period for the proposed agreement. Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, approved under section 468A of the Act, was authorised to conduct the ballot.

The Deputy President was satisfied that the ANMF had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Stonnington and that all requirements of section 443(1) were met. The Commission set the closing date for voting at 6 December 2024, which also established the ballot period for section 448A(2) of the Act. An Order was issued for a compulsory conciliation conference to be conducted by another Member of the Commission. This conference would require the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement and likely include directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.