Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation – South Australia Branch

Case [2022] FWC 129


[2022] FWC 129

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.512—Right of entry

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation – South Australia Branch

(RE2021/1359)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022

Application for a right of entry permit for Natasha Rose Sparrow – permit previously issued - permit never received – order revoking missing permit – permit reissued.

  1. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) applied under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for the issue of a right of entry permit to its official, Natasha Rose Sparrow. The Commission subsequently issued Ms Sparrow a right of entry permit which will expire on 21 December 2024.

  1. Ms Sparrow’s permit is one of the 37 missing entry permits referred to in decision [2022] FWC 123. As indicated in that decision, in order for Ms Sparrow to hold a valid entry permit, the missing permit must be revoked and a permit must be reissued. In order to issue a permit to Ms Sparrow, I need to be satisfied that she is a fit and proper person to hold a permit under the Act taking into account the permit qualification matters. The relevant statutory considerations set out in [2022] FWC 123 are adopted here and need not be repeated.

Consideration

  1. In support of its application the ANMF filed declarations by Ms Sparrow and Adj Associate Elizabeth Dabars, Branch Secretary (the Declarations).

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f)

  1. According to the Declarations:

·   Ms Sparrow has received appropriate training about the rights and responsibilities of a permit holder by undertaking a course of training on the subject of a federal right of entry conducted on 29 November 2021 (s.513(1)(a) of the Act));[1] 

·   Ms Sparrow has never been convicted of an offence against an industrial law (s.513(1)(b) of the Act);[2]

·   Ms Sparrow has never been convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, State, Territory or a foreign country, involving conduct described in s.513(1)(c) of the Act;[3]

·   Neither Ms Sparrow nor any other person has been ordered to pay a penalty under this Act or any other industrial law in relation to action taken by her (s.513(1)(d) of the Act);[4]

·   Ms Sparrow has not had any entry permit issued under Part 3-4 of the Act or a similar law of the Commonwealth revoked, suspended or had imposed conditions on any such permit (s.513(1)(e) of the Act);[5]

·   Ms Sparrow has not had cancelled, suspended or imposed conditions on any right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes that Ms Sparrow held under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(i) of the Act);[6] and

·   Ms Sparrow has not been disqualified from exercising or applying for a right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(ii) of the Act).[7]

  1. I accept that the information disclosed in the Declarations concerning these matters is accurate and correct. These matters weigh in favour of a conclusion that Ms Sparrow is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(g)

  1. There are no other matters of which I am aware that I consider relevant to the determination of whether Ms Sparrow is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

Conclusion

  1. Pursuant to s.603 of the Act, the entry permit formerly issued to Ms Sparrow by decision of the delegate is revoked with effect from the date of this decision. A revocation order is separately issued in PR737825.

  1. Taking in account the permit qualification matters, for the reasons earlier stated I am satisfied that Ms Sparrow is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

  1. A permit will be reissued to Ms Sparrow separately.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Form F42, Declaration by proposed permit holder dated 1 December 2021 at (a) and ACTU Certificate of Completion dated 29 November 2021

[2] Ibid at (b)

[3] Ibid at (c)

[4] Ibid at (d)

[5] Ibid at (e)

[6] Ibid at (f)

[7] Ibid at (g)

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR737717>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation – South Australia Branch [2022] FWC 129
Case
[2022] FWC 129
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) sought a right of entry permit for Natasha Rose Sparrow under section 512 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Sparrow’s initial permit had gone missing, and the Commission subsequently issued her a permit which is set to expire on 21 December 2024. Sparrow's permit was among the 37 missing permits mentioned in decision [2022] FWC 123. To rectify the situation, the missing permit must be revoked and a new permit reissued.

The Deputy President, Gostencnik, addressed the application and the need to determine if Sparrow is a fit and proper person to hold a permit. The considerations outlined in decision [2022] FWC 123 were adopted, focusing on the statutory qualification matters set out in section 513(1) of the Act. Sparrow’s declarations and those of Adj Associate Elizabeth Dabars, the Branch Secretary, were examined. Sparrow had received appropriate training, had no convictions against industrial laws, no disqualifying criminal convictions, no penalties imposed under industrial laws, no revoked, suspended, or conditioned permits, and was not disqualified from holding permits under state or territory laws. These factors supported the conclusion that Sparrow is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.

The Deputy President revoked Sparrow's previous permit and issued a new one, effective from the date of the decision. The revocation order was issued separately. Given the permit qualification matters, the Deputy President concluded that Sparrow was suitable to hold the permit, and a new permit would be issued to her.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.