Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - New South Wales Branch

Case [2022] FWC 125


[2022] FWC 125

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.512—Right of entry

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - New South Wales Branch

(RE2021/1241)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022

Application for a right of entry permit for Peter James Morris – permit previously issued - permit never received – order revoking missing permit – permit reissued.

  1. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) applied under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for the issue of a right of entry permit to its official, Mr Peter James Morris. The Commission subsequently issued Mr Moriss a right of entry permit which will expire on 15 December 2024.

  1. Mr Moriss’ permit is one of the 37 missing entry permits referred to in decision [2022] FWC 123. As indicated in that decision, in order for Mr Moriss to hold a valid entry permit, the missing permit must be revoked and a permit must be reissued. In order to issue a permit to Mr Moriss, I need to be satisfied that he is a fit and proper person to hold a permit under the Act taking into account the permit qualification matters. The relevant statutory considerations set out in [2022] FWC 123 are adopted here and need not be repeated.

Consideration

  1. In support of its application the ANMF filed declarations by Mr Moriss and Ms Shaye Candish, Branch Assistant Secretary (the Declarations).

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f)

  1. According to the Declarations:

·   Mr Moriss has received appropriate training about the rights and responsibilities of a permit holder by undertaking a course of training on the subject of a federal right of entry conducted on 10 August 2021 (s.513(1)(a) of the Act));[1] 

·   Mr Moriss has never been convicted of an offence against an industrial law (s.513(1)(b) of the Act);[2]

·   Mr Moriss has never been convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, State, Territory or a foreign country, involving conduct described in s.513(1)(c) of the Act;[3]

·   Neither Mr Moriss nor any other person has been ordered to pay a penalty under this Act or any other industrial law in relation to action taken by him (s.513(1)(d) of the Act);[4]

·   Mr Moriss has not had any entry permit issued under Part 3-4 of the Act or a similar law of the Commonwealth revoked, suspended or had imposed conditions on any such permit (s.513(1)(e) of the Act);[5]

·   Mr Moriss has not had cancelled, suspended or imposed conditions on any right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes that Mr Moriss held under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(i) of the Act);[6] and

·   Mr Moriss has not been disqualified from exercising or applying for a right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(ii) of the Act).[7]

  1. I accept that the information disclosed in the Declarations concerning these matters is accurate and correct. These matters weigh in favour of a conclusion that Mr Moriss is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.

Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(g)

  1. There are no other matters of which I am aware that I consider relevant to the determination of whether Mr Moriss is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

Conclusion

  1. Pursuant to s.603 of the Act, the entry permit formerly issued to Mr Moriss by decision of the delegate is revoked with effect from the date of this decision. A revocation order is separately issued in PR737825.

  1. Taking in account the permit qualification matters, for the reasons earlier stated I am satisfied that Mr Moriss is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.

  1. A permit will be reissued to Mr Moriss separately.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Form F42, Declaration by proposed permit holder dated 10 November 2021 at (a) and ACTU Certificate of Completion dated 10 August 2021

[2] Ibid at (b)

[3] Ibid at (c)

[4] Ibid at (d)

[5] Ibid at (e)

[6] Ibid at (f)

[7] Ibid at (g)

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR737713>

Details
AGLC
Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation - New South Wales Branch [2022] FWC 125
Case
[2022] FWC 125
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) sought a right of entry permit for its official, Mr Peter James Morris, under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Mr Morris’ permit was among the 37 missing permits referenced in decision [2022] FWC 123. To issue a permit, the Deputy President needed to be satisfied that Mr Morris was a fit and proper person to hold a permit, considering the relevant statutory considerations.

The legal issues in this case centred around whether Mr Morris met the qualifications to hold a right of entry permit, including his training, criminal record, and any previous penalties or permit revocations. The Deputy President needed to consider the permit qualification matters outlined in s.513(1) of the Act.

After reviewing the declarations provided by Mr Morris and Ms Shaye Candish, Branch Assistant Secretary, the Deputy President found that Mr Morris had received the necessary training, had no criminal convictions relevant to an industrial law, and had no previous penalties or permit revocations. These findings supported the conclusion that Mr Morris was a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit. Consequently, the Deputy President revoked the previously issued permit and ordered a new permit to be issued to Mr Morris, set to expire on 15 December 2024.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.