Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 31


[2025] FWC 31

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v

NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd

(B2025/4)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 6 JANUARY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd (NRG or Employer).

  1. I note that the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and the Mining and Energy Union (MEU)[1] have each made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 3 January 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application, as amended following discussions between the parties.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Benjamin Ellis, Senior Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with NRG, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 20 January 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended minimum period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking certain industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of five (5) working days applies to certain items listed within Clause 14 of the Order. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR782998.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Respectively, B2025/1, B2025/2, B2025/3 and B2025/5.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR782999>

Details
AGLC
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 31
Case
[2025] FWC 31
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd, the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) sought a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for certain employees of NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd. This request arose from the ASU's attempt to reach a genuine agreement with NRG regarding a proposed enterprise agreement. The ASU contended that the required notification period for the proposed agreement had been met and that all the statutory requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were satisfied.

The legal issues before the Court were whether the ASU had met the statutory requirements to conduct a protected action ballot and if so, whether the proposed ballot should proceed. Specifically, the Court needed to determine if the ASU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the employer and if the necessary notification period had been adhered to. The Court also had to consider whether the proposed ballot period was appropriate and if there were exceptional circumstances that warranted an extended notice period for certain industrial actions.

The Court found that the ASU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with NRG and that all statutory requirements for the ballot were met. The Court was satisfied that the notification period had been observed and that the proposed ballot agent, Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, was authorised to conduct the ballot. The Court determined that there were relevant exceptional circumstances justifying an extended minimum notice period for certain items in the proposed agreement, setting the closing date for voting as 20 January 2025. An Order was issued separately to address the extended notice period. The matter was assigned to another member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference.

The Court ordered that the ballot proceed as requested by the ASU and that the parties attend the compulsory conciliation conference. Directions were also to be issued to ensure the parties were prepared for meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.