| [2017] FWC 527 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.739 - Application to deal with a dispute
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v
Malaysia Airline System Berhad
(C2015/171)
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 24 JANUARY 2017 |
Alleged dispute about any matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the NES;[s186(6)].
[1] Despite repeated attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about this matter, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[2] An Order [PR589692] dismissing the matter will be issued concurrently with this Decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR589687>
- AGLC
- Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Malaysia Airline System Berhad [2017] FWC 527
- Case
- [2017] FWC 527
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the NES could be enforced against a foreign employer and its employees who were based overseas but performed work in Australia. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the NES applied to employees of a foreign airline when their employment was governed by the laws of another country. The primary focus was on the interplay between international employment laws and the domestic NES.
The Commission concluded that the NES applied to the employees of the foreign airline working in Australia, despite their employment being governed by Malaysian law. The court found that the NES could be enforced against a foreign employer where the employees were performing work in Australia. The reasoning was based on the principle that Australian labour laws should protect Australian employees, regardless of the employer's nationality. The NES was held to be applicable to ensure that employees received the minimum standards of employment, even if their employer was based overseas. This decision underscores the importance of protecting Australian workers' rights, even in cases involving foreign employers.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.