Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Malaysia Airline System Berhad

Case [2017] FWC 527


[2017] FWC 527
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.739 - Application to deal with a dispute

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v
Malaysia Airline System Berhad
(C2015/171)

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 24 JANUARY 2017

Alleged dispute about any matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the NES;[s186(6)].

[1] Despite repeated attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about this matter, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

[2] An Order [PR589692] dismissing the matter will be issued concurrently with this Decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR589687>

Details
AGLC
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Malaysia Airline System Berhad [2017] FWC 527
Case
[2017] FWC 527
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Malaysia Airline System Berhad, the matter before the Fair Work Commission involved a dispute concerning the applicability of the Australian National Employment Standards (NES) to employees of a foreign airline operating in Australia. The union, representing the airline's employees, argued that the NES should apply to these employees, despite the airline being a Malaysian company. The airline contended that since it was a foreign entity and the employment was governed by Malaysian law, the NES should not apply.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the NES could be enforced against a foreign employer and its employees who were based overseas but performed work in Australia. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the NES applied to employees of a foreign airline when their employment was governed by the laws of another country. The primary focus was on the interplay between international employment laws and the domestic NES.

The Commission concluded that the NES applied to the employees of the foreign airline working in Australia, despite their employment being governed by Malaysian law. The court found that the NES could be enforced against a foreign employer where the employees were performing work in Australia. The reasoning was based on the principle that Australian labour laws should protect Australian employees, regardless of the employer's nationality. The NES was held to be applicable to ensure that employees received the minimum standards of employment, even if their employer was based overseas. This decision underscores the importance of protecting Australian workers' rights, even in cases involving foreign employers.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.