Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Endeavour Energy

Case

[2015] FWC 1190

27 FEBRUARY 2015

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2015] FWC 1190

The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on Friday 27 February 2015.

Leading capitals have been added to the position titles in [4] and [5].

Edrea Tio

Associate to Senior Deputy President Harrison

Dated 2 March 2015.

[2015] FWC 1190
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v
Endeavour Energy
(B2015/29)

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HARRISON

SYDNEY, 27 FEBRUARY 2015

Protected action ballot of employees of Endeavour Energy.

[1] This decision concerns an application made pursuant to s 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, known as the Australian Services Union (the Union). The Union seeks a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Endeavour Energy (Endeavour).

[2] I note that I heard an application by the Union for an identical protected action ballot order in relation to employees of Endeavour on 9 January 2015 1 (the 9 January application) and issued that protected action ballot order on 12 January 20152 (the 12 January order).

[3] On 11 February 2015, the Australian Electoral Commission provided me with the Declaration of Results of the protected action ballot held pursuant to the 12 January order. The Declaration indicated that less than 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot. Accordingly, the ballot was incapable of authorising the relevant industrial action, as it did not comply with the requirement in s 459(1)(b) of the Act.

[4] A hearing of the present application was conducted on 26 February 2015. I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of s 443 of the Act has been met. In reaching my decision, I rely upon a witness statement of Mr Scott McNamara, a Manager of the Union, providing information about matters relevant to s 443(1)(b) of the Act.

[5] In accordance with s 443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying an extension to the period of written notice contained in s 414(2)(a) of the Act. The period will be extended to 7 working days. In reaching my decision I rely upon a witness statement of Mr Ty Christopher, General Manager of Network Development at Endeavour.

[6] Provided the requirements of the Act are satisfied, which in my opinion they are, I have no discretion to refuse to grant an order simply because an earlier ballot has been held and failed.

[7] The Union and Endeavour have agreed that the ballot should be conducted by way of postal vote and that I should record that fact in this decision.

[8] An order [PR561210] based on the draft order provided by the Union will be issued in conjunction with this decision.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

Mr M Dunstan andMr S McNamara on behalf of the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union.

Mr G Phillips and Ms N Petit, solicitors, on behalf of Endeavour Energy.

Hearing details:

Sydney.

2015.

February, 26.

 1   [2015] FWC 237.

 2   PR559903.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR561211>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0