Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v CS Energy Limited

Case [2024] FWC 1089


[2024] FWC 1089

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v

CS Energy Limited

(B2024/477)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 26 APRIL 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of CS Energy Limited

  1. This is an application by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of CS Energy Limited (CS Energy or Employer).

  1. I note that the Mining and Energy Union, Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) have made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation the same proposed agreement.[1]

  1. On 24 April, the Respondent advised that it did not object to the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Benjamin Ellis, Senior Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with CS Energy, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 7 June 2024.[2]  This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  2. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of seven (7) working days written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking the forms of industrial action arising from questions 1, 2, 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 in clause 5 of the Order made by the Commission. The default period of three working days will apply to the remaining forms of action arising from the ballot question.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR774251.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2024/480, B2024/481, and B2024/487.

[2] This is, in effect, thirty (30) working days from the date of the Order, which is the minimum period required by the AEC.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR774252>

Details
AGLC
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v CS Energy Limited [2024] FWC 1089
Case
[2024] FWC 1089
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order concerning employees of CS Energy Limited. The ASU sought this order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, aiming to facilitate a ballot for potential industrial action. CS Energy did not object to the application, and the matter was decided on the papers without a hearing.

The legal issues the court needed to address included whether the ASU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with CS Energy and if all statutory requirements for a ballot order were met. The court examined the declaration of Benjamin Ellis, Senior Industrial Officer of the ASU, who confirmed that the union had been genuinely attempting to negotiate. The court also considered the notification time for the proposed agreement and the need for an extended ballot period due to exceptional circumstances.

The Deputy President was satisfied that the ASU had met the statutory requirements and that there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended ballot period. The court issued an order for the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct the ballot, with voting to close on 7 June 2024. The order also specified the notice periods for different forms of industrial action, with a seven-working-day period for some actions and the default three-working-day period for others. A separate order was issued for the compulsory conciliation conference, which will be conducted by another member of the Commission.

The court issued an order permitting the ASU to conduct a protected action ballot among CS Energy employees. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission, with voting to close on 7 June 2024. The order also specified different notice periods for various forms of industrial action, reflecting the exceptional circumstances identified.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.