f_p_n_1_
[2024] FWC 3400
DECISION Fair Work Act 2009 s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
vCity of Greater Geelong
(B2024/1595)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 6 DECEMBER 2024 Proposed protected action ballot of employees of City of Greater Geelong
[1] This is an application by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of City of Greater Geelong (City of Geelong or Employer).
[2] On 5 December 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not
object to the Application but noted concerns it had in relation to when the ballot would close. The Applicant sought a ballot close date 7 days after commencement and in their response the employer proposed a 14-day ballot period. The ballot is to close on a date determined by the Commission and this is dealt with below.
[3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without
holding a hearing.
[4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Zoe Edwards,
Deputy Branch Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the
Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with City of Geelong,
I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
[5] The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has
been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and
consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.[6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date
by which voting is to close is 20 December 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the
purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and is the period determined by the Commission having
[7] An Order has been separately issued in PR782117.
f_p_n_2_
[2024] FWC 3400
[8] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the
s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR782118>
regard to all of the known circumstances including the impact of the upcoming Christmas/new year period.
- AGLC
- Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v City of Greater Geelong [2024] FWC 3400
- Case
- [2024] FWC 3400
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the ASU had met the requirements for a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to determine whether the notification time for the proposed agreement was met and if the ASU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the City of Geelong. The Commission also needed to decide the ballot close date, taking into account the upcoming Christmas/New Year period.
The Deputy President determined that the ASU had met the notification time requirements and had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the City of Geelong. The Commission was satisfied with the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the City of Geelong, as outlined in the declaration of Zoe Edwards, the Deputy Branch Secretary. Consequently, the application for the protected action ballot order was granted. The ballot close date was set for 20 December 2024, which was 10 working days from the making of the Order. The ballot would be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, which is an approved agent under the Act.
The Fair Work Commission issued an Order for the ballot and assigned the matter to another Member to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference. The Order required the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference, with the aim of ensuring meaningful negotiations. The Deputy President's decision was issued and the matter was to be handled by another Member of the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.