Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v City of Ballarat

Case

[2013] FWC 9396

28 NOVEMBER 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWC 9396

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v
City of Ballarat
(B2013/1514)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 28 NOVEMBER 2013

Proposed protected action ballot by employees of City of Ballarat.

[1] This is an application pursuant to s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (theAct) by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of City of Ballarat (the Respondent). The application was made on 25 November 2013.

[2] The Respondent has advised in correspondence that it would not oppose the making of the order.

[3] Section 443(1) of the Act states:

    443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order

    (1) The FWC must make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:

      (a) an application has been made under section 437; and

      (b) the FWC is satisfied that each applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.

[4] The ASU has provided a signed statement addressing those matters in s.443(1) of the Act.

[5] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

[6] I am satisfied that the requirements of s.443(1) of the Act have been met and that, accordingly, the Order must be made. I will issue an Order based on the draft order provided by the ASU.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR545141>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0