Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Brimbank City Council
[2014] FWC 6766
•1 OCTOBER 2014
| [2014] FWC 6766 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459—Protected action
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v
Brimbank City Council
(B2014/1403)
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 1 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2014/1187.
[1] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to extend the 30-day period in which industrial action is authorised by the respective protected action ballot.
[2] The Protected Action Ballot Order was made on 1 August 2014 [PR553797]. The ballot was declared by the Australian Electoral Commission on 29 August 2014. The 30-day period starting from the date of the declaration of the ballot, expires on 28 September 2014.
[3] The ASU lodged the application to extend the 30-day period on 24 September 2014. They have not previously sought to extend the period.
[4] Section 459 of the Act reads as follows:
459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
(1) Industrial action by employees is authorised by a protected action ballot if:
(a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and
(b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot; and
(c) more than 50% of the valid votes were votes approving the action; and
(d) the action commences:
(i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or
(ii) if FWA has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.
Note: Under Division 2, industrial action by employees for a proposed enterprise agreement (other than employee response action) is not protected industrial action unless it has been authorised in advance by a protected action ballot.
(2) If:
(a) the nature of the proposed industrial action specified in the question or questions put to the employees in the protected action ballot included periods of industrial action of a particular duration; and
(b) the question or questions did not specify that consecutive periods of that industrial action may be organised or engaged in;
then only the first period in a series of consecutive periods of that industrial action is the subject of the ballot for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a).
(3) FWA may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to FWA for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.
[5] On 29 September 2014, my associate contacted Brimbank City Council to determine if it had any submissions it wished to make on the application. I was subsequently advised in writing on 1 October 2014 that it did not oppose the application.
[6] In my opinion there is no need to hold a hearing to determine this matter. The requirements in s.459(3)(a) and (b) have been met.
[7] The application for an extension of the 30-day period is granted.
[8] An order to this effect shall be issued today.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR555921>
0
0
0