Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union Queensland Together Branch T/A Queensland Together Branch of the ASU

Case [2017] FWCA 5852


[2017] FWCA 5852

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

decision

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union Queensland Together Branch T/A Queensland Together Branch of the ASU

(AG2017/3650)

Together Organising Contact Centre Certified Agreement 2017

Clerical industry

Deputy President Kovacic

CANBERRA, 8 NOVEMBER 2017

Application for approval of the Together Organising Contact Centre Certified Agreement 2017.

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Together Organising Contact Centre Certified Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union Queensland Together Branch T/A Queensland Together Branch of the ASU. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted undertakings from Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union Queensland Together Branch T/A Queensland Together Branch of the ASU. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings are attached to this decision.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 November 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2020.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code O, AE426020  PR597548>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union Queensland Together Branch T/A Queensland Together Branch of the ASU [2017] FWCA 5852
Case
[2017] FWCA 5852
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union Queensland Together Branch trading as Queensland Together Branch of the ASU, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Together Organising Contact Centre Certified Agreement 2017. The application was opposed by the respondent, Contact Centre Services Pty Ltd trading as 1300 Direct. The dispute centred around the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009 in relation to the certification of the enterprise agreement. The case was heard by the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the application for approval of the agreement was lodged within the requisite timeframe, whether the agreement had been negotiated in good faith, and whether the agreement contained the necessary procedural fairness provisions. The Commission had to determine if the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including the provisions for employee consultation and the protection of employee rights.

In delivering its decision, the Commission found that the application was made within the prescribed timeframe and that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith. The Commission also determined that the agreement contained the necessary procedural fairness provisions and met the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide for adequate consultation and the protection of employee rights. The Full Bench approved the Together Organising Contact Centre Certified Agreement 2017.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Together Organising Contact Centre Certified Agreement 2017, effective from 1 July 2017. The Commission highlighted the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide for adequate consultation and the protection of employee rights. The approval of the agreement provides certainty and stability for both employers and employees in the contact centre industry.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.