| [2025] FWC 422 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Maritime Officers' Union
v
Newcastle Port Corporation T/A Port Authority of NSW
(B2025/240)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 12 FEBRUARY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Newcastle Port Corporation T/A Port Authority of NSW
This is an application by the Australian Maritime Officers’ Union (AMOU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Newcastle Port Corporation T/A Port Authority of NSW (Newcastle Port Corporation or Employer).
On 11 February 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jengis Osman, Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AMOU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Newcastle Port Corporation, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 26 February 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR784295.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the specific period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR784296>
- AGLC
- Australian Maritime Officers' Union v Newcastle Port Corporation T/A Port Authority of NSW [2025] FWC 422
- Case
- [2025] FWC 422
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that arose from this application involved verifying whether the AMOU had met the requirements under section 443 of the Act to hold a protected action ballot. This included establishing if there was a notification period for a proposed agreement, and if the AMOU had genuinely been attempting to reach an agreement with the Newcastle Port Corporation. Additionally, the court needed to determine the appropriate closing date for the ballot and ensure that the ballot was conducted by an approved agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS).
Deputy President Hampton found that all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were met, including the notification period for the proposed agreement and the AMOU's genuine bargaining efforts. The Deputy President also determined that CiVS was an approved agent and authorised to conduct the ballot. The court set the closing date for voting on the ballot as 26 February 2025, which is effectively 10 working days from the making of the order. This decision also set the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference.
The Fair Work Commission issued an order for a protected action ballot to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). The voting period for the ballot will close on 26 February 2025. This order also established the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. Another Member of the Commission will conduct a compulsory conciliation conference, requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement. Directions may also be issued to ensure the parties are ready to conduct meaningful negotiations at the conference.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.