AUSTRALIAN INVESTMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD
v
COMMISSIONER OF STATE REVENUE
[2019] HCASL 293
M63/2019
Insofar as the application raises any question of principle, this is not an appropriate vehicle in which to consider it. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. Special leave to appeal should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.
V.M Bell G.A.A Nettle 11 September 2019
- AGLC
- Australian Investment and Development Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2019] HCASL 293
- Case
- [2019] HCASL 293
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether the Court of Appeal's decision correctly interpreted the provisions of the State Taxation Relations Act 1980 (Vic) and whether there were any questions of principle that warranted further consideration. The Court was also required to determine if the application for special leave to appeal raised any significant issues that could not be adequately resolved at the appellate level.
The High Court found that the application did not raise any significant questions of principle that would warrant further consideration. The Court was satisfied with the Court of Appeal's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the State Taxation Relations Act 1980 (Vic). The High Court concluded that the decision of the Court of Appeal was correct and that there was no need to further examine the matter. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was refused.
The High Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. This order formalised the dismissal of the application and the associated costs order, effectively concluding the matter.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.