Australian Hotels Association

Case [2022] FWCFB 174


[2022] FWCFB 174

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT

Fair Work Act 2009

s.158—Application to vary or revoke a modern award

Australian Hotels Association

(AM2021/73)

Hospitality industry

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT
Deputy president clancy
commissioner bissett

MELBOURNE, 20 SEPTEMBER 2022

Application to vary modern award – Schedule J—Loaded Rate Arrangement – Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 – variation to J.5.1 and J.5.2.

Background

[1]       Schedule J[1] of the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 (Hospitality Award) provides for the payment of loaded rates to full-time employees classified at Level 3 or above in satisfaction of the requirement to pay overtime, penalty rates (except public holidays penalties) and the split shift allowance.

  1. During the hearing of the application which resulted in the insertion of the loaded rates into the Hospitality Award, the United Workers’ Union (UWU) submitted that the loaded rate percentages would need to be recalibrated each year to deal with any potential increase to the split shift allowance flowing from the Annual Wage Review (AWR).

  1. In response to that issue, we indicated that Commissioner Bissett would facilitate discussions amongst interested parties following the publication of the 2021-22 AWR decision about whether the loaded rates in Schedule J required adjustment to ensure that employees are not worse off.

  1. Following a public conference, on 25 August 2022 Commissioner Bissett issued a Report to the Full Bench setting out the views of interested parties and consensus position reached about whether the loaded rates in Schedule J required adjustment to ensure that employees are not worse off.

  1. On 26 August 2022 we issued a statement[2] (August 2022 statement) addressing the parties’ proposed solution to the loaded rates issue. A copy of Commissioner Bissett’s Report to the Full Bench was attached to our August 2022 statement.

  1. At [8] of our August 2022 statement we noted that Commissioner Bissett’s Report stated:

[15]      Arising from this review it is proposed that the rates be recalibrated such that the Level 3, 40 hour, Monday to Friday rate only increase from 110.20% to 110.30% and that clauses J.5.1 and J.5.2 be amended as per Schedule A.

[16]     As the determination issued in the Annual Wage Review 2021–22 will commence operation on 1 October 2022, the Full Bench may consider that the determination in this matter should come into effect on 2 October 2022 to avoid any confusion as to the timing of the adjustments.’

  1. At [10] of our August 2022 statement we expressed a provisional view that the Hospitality Award should be varied in the terms set out in Commissioner Bissett’s Report. A draft determination giving effect to the proposal and our provisional view was published with our August 2022 statement.

Conclusion

  1. At [11] of our August 2022 statement we invited interested parties to file any submissions opposing our provisional view set out at [10] by 4pm on 9 September 2022. Parties were informed that, in the absence of any opposition, we would confirm our provisional view and the variation would be made in the terms set out in the draft determination, operative 2 October 2022.

  1. No comments were received regarding our provisional view or the draft determination. Accordingly, we confirm our provisional view set out at [10] of our August 2022 statement. We are satisfied that the variation proposed is necessary taking into account the s.134 considerations of the Act. The variation will ensure that the modern award provides a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions required, ensuing that Level 3 employees are not worse off when using the provisions contained in Schedule J.

  1. A final variation determination will be issued to give effect to the amendments set out above. The operative date for the determination will be 2 October 2022.

PRESIDENT

<MA000009  PR745812>


[1] Previously Schedule K

[2] [2022] FWCFB 162

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Details
AGLC
Australian Hotels Association [2022] FWCFB 174
Case
[2022] FWCFB 174
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this matter, the Australian Hotels Association (the Applicant) applied for a variation of the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020. The application sought to amend the loaded rate percentages in Schedule J to ensure that employees are not worse off due to any potential increase to the split shift allowance resulting from the Annual Wage Review (AWR). The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, with Justice Ross, Deputy President Clancy, and Commissioner Bisset.

The central issue for the court was whether the loaded rate percentages in Schedule J of the Hospitality Award should be adjusted to ensure that employees are not worse off, taking into account the 2021-22 AWR decision. This required the court to consider the recommendations of Commissioner Bissett's Report to the Full Bench, which outlined the views of interested parties and the consensus position reached regarding the necessary adjustments.

The court considered the views of interested parties as presented in Commissioner Bissett's Report and noted that a consensus position had been reached to adjust the loaded rate percentages to ensure employees are not worse off. The court was satisfied that the proposed variation was necessary, taking into account the s.134 considerations of the Fair Work Act 2009. The variation was intended to ensure that the modern award provided a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions required, ensuring that Level 3 employees are not worse off when using the provisions contained in Schedule J.

As a result of the court's decision, a final variation determination will be issued to give effect to the amendments set out in Commissioner Bissett's Report. The operative date for the determination will be 2 October 2022, to avoid any confusion with the timing of the adjustments arising from the 2021-22 AWR decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.