Australian Federation of Air Pilots v Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 1045


[2024] FWC 1045

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Applications for a protected action ballot order

Australian Federation of Air Pilots
v

Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd

(B2024/458)

Transport Workers’ Union of Australia
v

Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd

(B2024/460)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 22 APRIL 2024

Proposed protected action ballots of employees of Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd

  1. The Australian Federation of Air Pilots (AFAP) and the Transport Workers’ Union (TWU) have each made applications under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd[1] (Surveillance Australia or Employer). 

  1. On 19 April 2023, the Commission was advised that Surveillance Australia did not object to the application, however it did seek an extended period of notice of industrial action. Further, it initially raised concerns with some of the proposed ballot questions; however, these concerns were not ultimately pressed as a basis of objection to either application.

  1. In the circumstances, on 22 April 2024 I convened a hearing to deal with both applications. During the hearing, the parties advised that based upon evidence[2] that had been provided by Surveillance Australia, a consent position had been reached in terms of the extent of notice of industrial action.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declarations of Simon Lutton, Executive Director of the AFAP, and Edward Nell, National Industrial Officer TWU, setting out the steps taken by the AFAP and the TWU in bargaining with the Employer and that they have been, and are, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Surveillance Australia, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot in each matter is to be conducted by TrueVote Pty Ltd. TrueVote has been approved[3] as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close in each matter is 9 May 2024.[4] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of five (5) working days written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Orders made by the Commission.

  1. The Commission has also adopted the standard preamble to the ballot questions in each Order.

  1. Orders have been separately issued in PR773792 (AFAP) and PR773793 (TWU).

  1. These matters will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Surveillance Australia trades as Leidos Australia Airborne Services.

[2] A Statement of Jesse Young, head of Flight Operations with Surveillance Australia – exhibit 1.

[3] TrueVote Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 1446.

[4] This is, in effect, 12 working days (17 calendar days) from the making of the Orders, considering the impact of the Anzac Day Public Holiday as discussed with the parties.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR773794>

Details
AGLC
Australian Federation of Air Pilots v Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1045
Case
[2024] FWC 1045
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Federation of Air Pilots (AFAP) and the Transport Workers’ Union (TWU) made separate applications to the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd (Surveillance Australia). Surveillance Australia did not object to the applications but sought an extended period of notice for industrial action. The Commission convened a hearing to address both applications, during which the parties reached a consensus on the notice period based on evidence provided by Surveillance Australia.

The legal issues before the Deputy President involved determining whether the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met, particularly in light of the genuine efforts of the AFAP and TWU to negotiate with Surveillance Australia. Additionally, the court had to decide if the proposed ballot period and the extended notice period complied with the provisions of sections 414(2)(b) and 443(3)(c) of the Act, and whether exceptional circumstances justified the extended notice period.

The Deputy President concluded that the AFAP and TWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Surveillance Australia, and all requirements of section 443(1) of the Act were met. The Commission determined that the date for closing the voting in each matter would be 9 May 2024, which also set the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. The decision also addressed the need for an extended five-day notice period due to relevant exceptional circumstances. The Commission adopted the standard preamble for the ballot questions and issued separate orders for each application.

The final orders included the approval of the ballot period, the extended notice period, and the adoption of the standard preamble for the ballot questions. The cases were assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference, with directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.