Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No 4)

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No 4)

[2012] FCA 1506

Citation: Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No 4) [2012] FCA 1506
Parties: AUSTRALIAN EXECUTOR TRUSTEES LIMITED v PROVIDENT CAPITAL LIMITED
File number: NSD 808 of 2012
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 17 December 2012
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 283HA, 283HB(1)(g), 424
Cases cited: Australian Executor Trustees Limited v Provident Capital Limited (No 3) (2012) FCA 1253 referred to
Date of hearing: 17 December 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr J Hynes
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Henry Davis York
Counsel for the Amicus Curiae
(Australian Securities & Investments Commission):

Ms R A Howitt


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 808 of 2012

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN EXECUTOR TRUSTEES LIMITED
Plaintiff

AND:

PROVIDENT CAPITAL LIMITED
Defendant

JUDGE:

RARES J

DATE OF ORDER:

17 DECEMBER 2012

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Pursuant to section 283HB(1)(g) and section 424 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) the defendant, by its receivers, Marcus William Ayres, Philip Patrick Carter and Anthony Milton Sims (the Receivers), would be justified in amending clause 11.5 of the Debenture Trust Deed dated 11 December 1998 (as amended from time to time) (the Deed) so that it reads as follows: (with the amendments underlined only for the purpose of identifying them in these orders):

Notwithstanding clause 2.3, subject always to the rights of persons whose claims to payment are preferred by law, all money received by the Trustee or any receiver from the Company, as a consequence of enforcement of the Trustee's rights against the Company, must be applied in the following order:

11.5.1first, in payment of the Trustee's remuneration and other expenses under this deed;

11.5.2second, in payment of the receiver's remuneration and expenses;

11.5.3third, in payment to the Trustee for the account of debenture holders in respect of interest accrued but unpaid on current debentures up to (and including) 3 July 2012;

11.5.4fourth, in payment to the Trustee for the account of debenture holders in respect of the face value of current debentures;

11.5.4Afifth, when the face value of current debentures has been repaid in full, in or towards payment to the Trustee for the account of debenture holders in respect of interest accrued but unpaid on current debentures after 3 July 2012 (such interest to accrue after 3 July 2012 at a flat rate of 10% per annum on each current debenture on the daily balance of the face value remaining unpaid of that debenture despite any provision to the contrary in this deed or in the Terms of Issue of any debenture); and

11.5.5sixth, when the amounts referred to in clause 11.5.4A have been paid in full, any balance to the Company.

(the Amendment).

2.Pursuant to section 283HA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No... and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] FCA 1506
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No 4), the Federal Court of Australia was tasked with determining whether receivers of Provident Capital Limited could amend the Debenture Trust Deed to alter the order in which debenture holders would be repaid. The case involved Australian Executor Trustees Limited, the trustee of the debenture trust deed, and Provident Capital Limited, the company in receivership. The primary legal issue revolved around the authority of the receivers to amend the trust deed and the validity of the proposed changes, particularly concerning the repayment of interest on debentures.

The court found that the receivers had acted within their authority under sections 283HA and 283HB(1)(g) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by amending the trust deed to modify the repayment priority. The receivers had convened a meeting of debenture holders, where a significant majority voted in favour of the proposed amendments. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission, appearing as an amicus curiae, did not oppose the amendment, stating that there had been adequate disclosure and that the majority vote should be upheld. The court concluded that the receivers were justified in amending the trust deed as proposed and in making payments to debenture holders according to the new terms.

The court's decision was based on the overwhelming support from debenture holders and the receivers' careful handling of the meeting and voting process. The amendment ensured that the trust deed reflected the likely financial reality, prioritising certain payments to secure some recovery for debenture holders. Consequently, the court made orders approving the amendment and authorising the receivers to proceed with the changes and subsequent payments.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.