Australian Construction & Engineering Services Pty Ltd

[2013] FWCA 6200

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Australian Construction & Engineering Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2355)

AUSTRALIAN CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING SERVICES PTY LTD (CALTEX LYTTON REFINERY - QLD) UNION AGREEMENT 2013 - 2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS	BRISBANE, 27 AUGUST 2013

Application for approval of the Australian Construction & Engineering Services Pty Ltd (Caltex Lytton Refinery - QLD) Union Agreement 2013 - 2015.

[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 15 August 2013 by Australian Construction & Engineering Services Pty Ltd for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the Australian Construction & Engineering Services Pty Ltd (Caltex Lytton Refinery - QLD) Union Agreement 2013 - 2015(“the Agreement”).

[2] A statutory declaration was provided by Mr B. Swan, Queensland Branch Secretary, of the Australian Workers’ Union (“the AWU”).

[3] In light of this statutory declaration and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the AWU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application by Australian Construction & Engineering Services Pty Ltd (ACES) for approval of the Caltex Lytton Refinery Union Agreement 2013-2015. The dispute centred around whether the agreement met the criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically section 234, which requires that such agreements be approved if they are considered to be in the best interests of the employees. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, including whether it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act and whether it was genuinely agreed upon by the parties involved. The Commission had to consider if the agreement was appropriately negotiated and if it addressed the needs and interests of the employees adequately.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval. It determined that the agreement was genuinely negotiated, and the terms and conditions were fair and reasonable for the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for appropriate wages, leave entitlements, and other benefits that were in line with industry standards and did not disadvantage the employees. The Commission also considered that the agreement adequately addressed the needs of the workforce and was in the best interests of the employees. Therefore, the Commission approved the application for the agreement.

The Fair Work Commission approved the application, thereby endorsing the Caltex Lytton Refinery Union Agreement 2013-2015 as meeting the requirements under the Fair Work Act. This decision allowed the agreement to be implemented, providing a clear framework for the terms and conditions of employment for the relevant employees.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established