FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones (No 2) [2010] FCA 371
Citation: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones (No 2) [2010] FCA 371 Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION v DARRYL PETER JONES File number: QUD 54 of 2010 Judge: LOGAN J Date of judgment: 14 April 2010 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application for extension of time to comply with Order of Court after expiry of time for compliance - Where Order is subject to separate application for extension of time for leave to appeal - Where solicitor and respondent have given undertakings - Court has discretion under Federal Court Rules, O 3 r 3 to extend time for compliance even after its expiry - Held, discretion exercised to grant extension of time upon undertakings given Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 3 r 3, O 62 r 23 Cases: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones [2010] FCA 205 Date of hearing: 14 April 2010 Place: Brisbane Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 35 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr MT Brady Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Levet Solicitor for the Respondent: Kinghan & Associates
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
QUD 54 of 2010
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION
ApplicantAND: DARRYL PETER JONES
Respondent
JUDGE:
LOGAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
14 APRIL 2010
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
UPON THE UNDERTAKING OF THE RESPONDENT by his counsel to deliver to his solicitor, Ann Christine Kinghan of Kinghan & Associates, within 7 days a list (the client list) of the type described by paragraphs 3 and 4 of the orders made by Logan J on 5 March 2010;
AND UPON THE UNDERTAKING OF ANN CHRISTINE KINGHAN, in the event that the respondent supplies the client list to her in accordance with the respondent’s undertaking, within 7 working days from the date of the receipt of the client list to send or transmit a copy of Schedule “A” to the interlocutory orders made on 5 March 2010 to each person on the client list at the postal, email or facsimile address disclosed on the client list;
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time for compliance with order 3 of the interlocutory orders made on 5 March 2010 be extended until seven days after the hearing and determination of the respondent's application for an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal from those orders, or such later date as may be fixed by the Court.
2.Ann Christine Kinghan file and serve an affidavit by 5 May 2010 deposing as to compliance with the undertakings noted above.
3.The applicant has leave to discontinue the motion and statement of charge filed 31 March 2010.
4.The respondent pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to the respondent's oral application of 14 April 2010 to extend time for compliance with paragraph 3 of the orders of 5 March 2010.
5.As to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones (No 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2010] FCA 371
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to address were whether the Federal Court had the discretion to extend the time for compliance with a court order that had already lapsed, and if so, under what conditions. Additionally, the court needed to consider the relevant Federal Court Rules, particularly Rule 3, which governs the extension of time, and the undertakings provided by the respondent's solicitor and Jones.
The court exercised its discretion under the Federal Court Rules to grant an extension of time for compliance, despite the original deadline having passed. This decision was based on the undertakings provided by the respondent's solicitor and Jones, which the court deemed sufficient to warrant an extension. The court also noted that the Order was subject to a separate application for an extension of time for leave to appeal. Furthermore, the court ordered that the respondent pay certain costs related to the proceedings.
The final orders included extending the time for compliance with the earlier court order until seven days after the hearing and determination of Jones's application for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal, or such later date as the Court may fix. Additionally, Ann Christine Kinghan was required to file and serve an affidavit by 5 May 2010, confirming compliance with the undertakings. The ACCC was granted leave to discontinue its motion and statement of charge filed on 31 March 2010. The respondent was ordered to pay the ACCC's costs for the oral application to extend time for compliance and for the motion filed on 31 March 2010 up to and including 30 March 2010. The costs of the directions hearing of 14 April 2010 were reserved.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The time for compliance with order 3 of the interlocutory orders made on 5 March 2010 be extended until seven days after the hearing and determination of the respondent's application for an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal from those orders, or such later date as may be fixed by the Court.
2. Ann Christine Kinghan file and serve an affidavit by 5 May 2010 deposing as to compliance with the undertakings noted above.
3. The applicant has leave to discontinue the motion and statement of charge filed 31 March 2010.
4. The respondent pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to the respondent's oral application of 14 April 2010 to extend time for compliance with paragraph 3 of the orders of 5 March 2010.
5. As to the costs of the applicant’s motion filed 31 March 2010:
5.1 the respondent pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental thereto up to and including 30 March 2010;
5.2 otherwise, there be no order as to the costs of that motion.
6. The costs of the directions hearing of 14 April 2010 be reserved.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.