FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 723
Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 723 Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v HEWLETT-PACKARD AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 004 394 763) File number(s): NSD 1588 of 2012 Judge(s): BUCHANAN J Date of judgment: 17 July 2015 Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 653 Date of hearing: Heard on the papers Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: No Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 4 Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Solicitor for the Respondent: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 1588 of 2012
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
ApplicantAND: HEWLETT-PACKARD AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 004 394 763)
Respondent
JUDGE:
BUCHANAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
17 JULY 2015
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Effective from 1 August 2015, orders made in these proceedings on 5 July 2013 (Orders) be varied as follows:
a.the reference to HPA be changed to “HP PPS Australia Pty Ltd ACN 603 480 628 (HPS)”, for order 7 of the Orders;
b.references to HPA be changed to “HPS”, for orders 7.1 to 7.6, 8, 11, 17, Annexure B and Annexure D (paragraphs 6 to 9, 11 to 15) of the Orders;
c.references to HPA Computer Products be changed to “HPS Computer Products”, for orders 7, 11 and Annexure B of the Orders;
d.references to the HPA Website be changed to “HPS Website”, for order 11 of the Orders; and
e.references to the HPA Online Store be changed to “HPS Online Store” and the URL to be changed to for orders 7 and 11 of the Orders,
to the extent that there are ongoing obligations and requirements.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 1588 of 2012
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
ApplicantAND: HEWLETT-PACKARD AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 004 394 763)
Respondent
JUDGE:
BUCHANAN J
DATE:
17 JULY 2015
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BUCHANAN J:
On 5 July 2013, I made orders against the respondent (HPA) with its consent, HPA having accepted that it had contravened ss 18 and 29(1)(m) of the Australian Consumer Law (which is Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)). The circumstances leading to the making of those orders were explained in Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 653.
The Court has now been informed that HPA will restructure its business and operations in a manner consistent with a global re-organisation whereby the ultimate parent company of HPA, Hewlett-Packard Company which is incorporated in the United States of America, will separate into two separate companies. The result of the separation will be that in Australia HPA will no longer manufacture and supply the computer products that are the subject of the orders. Instead, from 1 August 2015 HP PPS Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 603 480 628) (HPS) will manufacture and supply the computer products and will be the entity which should be bound by the orders made on 5 July 2013.
The applicant has informed the Court that it does not oppose the orders being amended to give effect to the respondent’s proposal.
I am satisfied that the proposal gives continuing effect to the terms of the orders made on 5 July 2013 and that it is appropriate that orders be made varying those orders in the terms proposed by the respondent which are not opposed by the applicant.
I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Buchanan. Associate:
Dated: 17 July 2015
- AGLC
- Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 723
- Case
- [2015] FCA 723
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were primarily focused on the necessity and appropriateness of updating the previous orders to accurately reflect the current corporate structure of Hewlett-Packard's operations in Australia. The court needed to determine whether the changes proposed by the Commission were justified, and if so, whether they should be implemented to ensure compliance with the original orders. The court also had to consider the implications of the restructuring on the ongoing obligations and requirements imposed on Hewlett-Packard Australia.
The court found that the changes proposed by the Commission were necessary and appropriate to ensure that the orders continued to accurately reflect the current legal entities involved in the case. The court noted that the restructuring of Hewlett-Packard Australia had resulted in the creation of HP PPS Australia Pty Ltd, which was now responsible for the relevant operations. The court held that updating the orders to reflect this change was essential for the effective enforcement of the original orders. The court further found that the proposed changes were in line with the objectives of the original orders and would not unduly prejudice the rights of any party.
As a result, the court made the orders varying the previous orders to reflect the new corporate structure of Hewlett-Packard's operations in Australia. The changes included updating references to the relevant entities and their websites to accurately reflect the current legal entities. The court's decision ensures that the orders remain effective and enforceable, and that the obligations imposed on Hewlett-Packard Australia are properly aligned with its current corporate structure.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Effective from 1 August 2015, orders made in these proceedings on 5 July 2013 (Orders) be varied as follows:
a. the reference to HPA be changed to “HP PPS Australia Pty Ltd ACN 603 480 628 (HPS)”, for order 7 of the Orders;
b. references to HPA be changed to “HPS”, for orders 7.1 to 7.6, 8, 11, 17, Annexure B and Annexure D (paragraphs 6 to 9, 11 to 15) of the Orders;
c. references to HPA Computer Products be changed to “HPS Computer Products”, for orders 7, 11 and Annexure B of the Orders;
d. references to the HPA Website be changed to “HPS Website”, for order 11 of the Orders; and
e. references to the HPA Online Store be changed to “HPS Online Store” and the URL http://h20386.www2hp.com/AustraliaStore/ to be changed to http://h20386.www2.hp.com/AustraliaStore/Default.aspx, for orders 7 and 11 of the Orders,
to the extent that there are ongoing obligations and requirements.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.