FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Windus [2019] FCA 1526
File number: WAD 185 of 2019 Judge: JACKSON J Date of judgment: 13 September 2019 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for substituted service - personal service not practicable - reasonable possibility that proposed methods will place recipient on notice - application granted Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 562
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 10.24, 15.08
Cases cited: British American Tobacco Australasia Limited v Taleb (No 1) [2012] FCA 1065
Combis (Trustee) v Spottiswood [2011] FCA 1082; (2011) 123 ALD 40
Commissioner of Taxation v Caratti (No 2) [2018] FCA 1500
Statewide Secured Investments Pty Ltd v Tarrant [2011] FCA 1067
Date of hearing: 13 September 2019 Registry: Western Australia Division: Fair Work Division National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 9 Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant was excused from appearing Solicitor for the Applicant: Herbert Smith Freehills Counsel for the Cross‑Claimants: Ms JR Moore Solicitor for the Cross‑Claimants: Eureka Lawyers Counsel for the Cross‑Respondents: The cross‑respondents were excused from appearing Solicitor for the Cross‑Respondents: King & Wood Mallesons ORDERS
WAD 185 of 2019 BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSIONER
Applicant
AND: JOHN WINDUS
First Respondent
STEPHEN PARKER
Second Respondent
CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MARITIME, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
Third Respondent
AND BETWEEN: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MARITIME, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
First Cross‑Claimant
JOHN WINDUS
Second Cross‑ClaimantSTEPHEN PARKER
Third Cross‑ClaimantAND: SKS GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 122 565 262)
First Cross‑Respondent
THAYALAN KRISHAN
Second Cross‑RespondentBENJAMIN SIPKES
Third Cross‑RespondentNICHOLAS WARD
Fourth Cross‑Respondent
JUDGE:
JACKSON J
DATE OF ORDER:
13 SEPTEMBER 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The cross‑claimants' interlocutory application dated 1 August 2019 is allowed.
Substitution of the first cross‑respondent
2.Pursuant to r 9.08 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (Rules), SKS Group Pty Ltd (ACN 122 565 262) is removed as the first cross‑respondent.
3.Pursuant to r 9.05(1) of the Rules, SKS Builders Pty Ltd (ACN 163 340 181) is joined to the proceedings and substituted as the first cross‑respondent.
4.The cross‑claimants are granted leave to file and serve an amended notice of cross‑claim and an amended statement of cross‑claim substituting SKS Builders Pty Ltd (ACN 163 340 181) as the first cross‑respondent by no later than 16 September 2019.
Substituted service on the third cross‑respondent
5.Pursuant to r 10.24(b) of the Rules:
(a)each of the notice of cross‑claim and statement of cross‑claim filed in these proceedings (Cross‑claim Documents) may be served and be brought to the attention of the third cross‑respondent by:
(i)sending a text message to the telephone number given in paragraph 6 of the affidavit of Nicola Iannetta affirmed 10 September 2019 in these proceedings stating as follows:
Dear Mr Sipkes
A cross‑claim in proceeding WAD 185 of 2019 has been commenced against you in the Federal Court of Australia by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, Stephen Parker and John Windus alleging breaches of the
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Windus and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] FCA 1526
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether substituted service was appropriate in these circumstances. The cross-claimants demonstrated that personal service was not practicable as Sipkes had not responded to previous attempts to serve him. The court found that sending a text message and email to Sipkes was likely to place him on notice, as he had previously engaged with the cross-claimants by email and had a telephone number listed on LinkedIn. The court held that substituted service was appropriate in these circumstances.
The court granted the cross-claimants' interlocutory application for substituted service. It ordered that SKS Group Pty Ltd be removed as the first cross-respondent and SKS Builders Pty Ltd be substituted as the first cross-respondent. The court also ordered that the notice of cross-claim and statement of cross-claim be served on Sipkes by sending a text message and email. The court further ordered that the cross-respondents file and serve any defences to the cross-claim by 21 October 2019 and that the cross-claimants file and serve any reply by 4 November 2019. The cross-claim was listed for mediation before a Registrar of the Court after 11 November 2019.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The cross‑claimants' interlocutory application dated 1 August 2019 is allowed.
Substitution of the first cross‑respondent
2. Pursuant to r 9.08 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (Rules), SKS Group Pty Ltd (ACN 122 565 262) is removed as the first cross‑respondent.
3. Pursuant to r 9.05(1) of the Rules, SKS Builders Pty Ltd (ACN 163 340 181) is joined to the proceedings and substituted as the first cross‑respondent.
4. The cross‑claimants are granted leave to file and serve an amended notice of cross‑claim and an amended statement of cross‑claim substituting SKS Builders Pty Ltd (ACN 163 340 181) as the first cross‑respondent by no later than 16 September 2019.
Substituted service on the third cross‑respondent
5. Pursuant to r 10.24(b) of the Rules:
(a) each of the notice of cross‑claim and statement of cross‑claim filed in these proceedings (Cross‑claim Documents) may be served and be brought to the attention of the third cross‑respondent by:
(i) sending a text message to the telephone number given in paragraph 6 of the affidavit of Nicola Iannetta affirmed 10 September 2019 in these proceedings stating as follows:
Dear Mr Sipkes
A cross‑claim in proceeding WAD 185 of 2019 has been commenced against you in the Federal Court of Australia by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, Stephen Parker and John Windus alleging breaches of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The court has ordered that you may be served with the documents commencing the cross‑claim by emailing them to a gmail.com address believed to be yours, and by means of this text message.
If you wish to defend the cross‑claim, you must file a notice of address for service in the Federal Court of Australia. You must also file a defence to the cross‑claim WITHIN 28 DAYS after the emailing of the documents or receipt of this text message (whichever is the last to occur). A copy of the notice of cross‑claim and statement of cross‑claim will be provided to you upon your request by calling (08) 9428 3333 or emailing abby.hadlow@eurekalawyers.com.au.
IMPORTANT: if you fail to file a notice of address for service, or fail to file a defence in the required time, then judgment may be entered against you or other orders adverse to your interests may be made.
(ii) emailing portable document format (pdf) copies of the Cross‑claim Documents and these orders to the email address given at paragraph 16 of the affidavit of David Anthony Edward Scaife affirmed 11 September 2019 in these proceedings, which email address must state as follows:
Dear Mr Sipkes
A cross‑claim in proceeding WAD 185 of 2019 has been commenced against you in the Federal Court of Australia by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, Stephen Parker and John Windus alleging breaches of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The court has ordered that you may be served with the documents commencing the cross‑claim by sending them by way of this email and by means of a text message to a telephone number believed to be yours.
If you wish to defend the cross‑claim, you must file a notice of address for service in the Federal Court of Australia. You must also file a defence to the cross‑claim WITHIN 28 DAYS after receipt of this email or receipt of the text message (whichever is the last to occur). A copy of each of the notice of cross‑claim and statement of cross‑claim is attached to this email.
IMPORTANT: if you fail to file a notice of address for service, or fail to file a defence in the required time, then judgment may be entered against you or other orders adverse to your interests may be made.
(b) the Cross‑claim Documents will be taken to have been served on the date of the last to occur of service as required by paragraph 1(a)(i) or 1(a)(ii) of these orders.
Further directions
6. By no later than 21 October 2019, the cross‑respondents shall file and serve any defence(s) to the cross‑claim.
7. By no later than 4 November 2019, the cross‑claimants shall file and serve any reply.
8. The cross‑claim is listed for a mediation before a Registrar of this Court on a date to be fixed after 11 November 2019.
9. Liberty to apply on 48 hours' notice.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.