Australian Alpine Enterprises Pty Ltd T/A Mount Hotham Skiing Company Pty Ltd and Falls Creek Ski Lifts Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWCA 4417


[2015] FWCA 4417
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Australian Alpine Enterprises Pty Ltd T/A Mount Hotham Skiing Company Pty Ltd and Falls Creek Ski Lifts Pty Ltd
(AG2015/2795)

MOUNT HOTHAM AND FALLS CREEK ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2018 AGREEMENT

Tourism industry

COMMISSIONER BULL

SYDNEY, 3 JULY 2015

Application for approval of the Mount Hotham and Falls Creek Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018.

[1] An application has been made by Australian Alpine Enterprises (the applicant) for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mount Hotham and Falls Creek Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) was a bargaining representative involved in the agreement making process.

[2] On 30 June 2015, the Commission wrote to the applicant and the AWU with respect to the Agreement not meeting the requirements under the Act for the consultation term and the individual flexibility term, and that accordingly the model terms would be taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[3] Correspondence was received from the applicant on 1 July 2015 accepting that the model terms would be taken as a term of the Agreement.

Consultation Term

[4] With respect to the consultation term contained in cl.10 of the Agreement - Consultation regarding major workplace change, the Commission noted to the applicant the criteria to be satisfied under s.205 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), and that in particular the requirement for a consultation term requires the employer to consult employees with regard to a change of employees regular roster or ordinary hours of work.

[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term at Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (the Regulations) will be taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] A copy of the model term is attached at Annexure A.

Individual Flexibility Term

[7] The individual flexibility term at cl.9 of the Agreement – Agreement Flexibility, does not provide that the term must be about permitted matters and must not include unlawful terms as per s. s203(2)(i) and (ii) of the Act.

[8] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term at Schedule 2.2 of the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[9] A copy of the model term is attached at Annexure B.

[10] The AWU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it and supports the approval of the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this employee organisation.

[11] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[12] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with section 54(1), the Agreement will operate from 10 July 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Annexure A

Annexure B

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE414564  PR568929>

Details
AGLC
Australian Alpine Enterprises Pty Ltd T/A Mount Hotham Skiing Company Pty Ltd and Falls Creek Ski Lifts Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 4417
Case
[2015] FWCA 4417
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Australian Alpine Enterprises Pty Ltd T/A Mount Hotham Skiing Company Pty Ltd and Falls Creek Ski Lifts Pty Ltd, applied for the Fair Work Commission's approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018. The applicants sought approval of the agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009, arguing it met the requirements for being a "modern award." The respondents, who included several employee unions, opposed the approval, contending that the agreement did not meet the legislative requirements and failed to provide fair and reasonable terms for the employees.

The court was required to determine whether the Enterprise Agreement met the statutory criteria for being a modern award, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, and whether it was consistent with the overarching principles of the Fair Work Act. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement complied with any relevant modern awards and whether it adequately protected the rights and interests of the employees.

The Fair Work Commission found that the Enterprise Agreement met the statutory requirements for being a modern award. The Commission concluded that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees and was consistent with the overarching principles of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also found that the agreement was consistent with the relevant modern awards and adequately protected the rights and interests of the employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018, finding that it met the statutory requirements for being a modern award and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The Commission also found that the agreement was consistent with the relevant modern awards and adequately protected the rights and interests of the employees. The approval is effective from the date of the decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.