Austin and Anor and Dunne

Link copied
Case Copied 25 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AUSTIN & ANOR & DUNNE [2016] FCCA 1015
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Parenting – where father committed suicide – where paternal grandparents seek orders whereby the young child aged less than 3 live with the paternal grandparents in Sydney and spend time with the mother who lives in (omitted) – where mother is seeking that the application be summarily dismissed – where oral application made for paternal grandparents to spend time with child – where oral application made for child’s name to be removed from airport to enable the mother to travel overseas with child – held that paternal grandparent’s initiating application be dismissed – where no evidence to support their claims – held that mother be permitted to travel overseas with child – held that paternal grandparents spend time with child for a day every two months.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.64B, 65DA

Federal Circuit Court Act 1999, s.17A
Federal Circuit Court Rules2001, r.13.10

Cases cited:

Church & M Overton & Anor [2008] FamCA 953
Lindon v Commonwealth (No 2) (1996) 136 ALR 251
McDonald & Sandler [2012] FamCAFC 191

Applicants: MR AUSTIN AND MS AUSTIN
Respondent: MS DUNNE
File Number: BRC 11585 of 2015
Judgment of: Judge L. Turner
Hearing date: 19 April 2016
Date of Last Submission: 19 April 2016
Delivered at: Brisbane
Delivered on: 21 April 2016

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicants: Mr Galloway
Solicitors for the Applicants: Marsdens Law Group
Solicitors for the Respondent: Mr Cooper of Cooper Family Law

ORDERS

  1. That the paternal grandparent’s Initiating Application filed on 3 December 2015 is hereby summarily dismissed.

  2. That forthwith the child X (who may also be recorded as X) born (omitted) 2013 be removed from the Airport Watch List.

  3. That the mother MS DUNNE born (omitted) 1987 and the child be permitted to travel outside the Commonwealth of Australia from 21 April 2016 to 16 May 2016.

  4. That commencing Saturday 21 May 2016 the paternal grandparents spend time with the child on the third Saturday of every second month from 9:00am to 5:00pm with changeover to occur at McDonald's (omitted) and that time occur with the child at other such times as can be agreed upon between the paternal grandparents and the mother.

  5. That the paternal grandparents file and serve within forty-two (42) days from the date hereof a fresh Initiating Application in respect to the spend time with arrangements only with respect to the child.

  6. That in the event that the paternal grandparents choose not to commence proceedings in accordance with Order (5) then the spend time with Order as provided for in Order (4) shall, upon the expiration of forty-two (42) days from the date hereof, become Final Orders and will issue as such from the Court.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Austin & Anor & Dunne is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT BRISBANE

BRC 11585…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Austin and Anor and Dunne and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] FCCA 1015
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application by the paternal grandparents, Austin and Anor, against the mother, MS Dunne, regarding their grandchild, child X. The dispute centred on the paternal grandparents' desire to have the child placed on an Airport Watch List and to prevent the child from travelling overseas with the mother. The proceedings were heard by Judge L. Turner.

The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the paternal grandparents' application to place the child on an Airport Watch List should be summarily dismissed, and whether the mother and child should be permitted to travel outside of Australia. The Court was also required to determine interim and potentially final arrangements for the paternal grandparents to spend time with the child.

Judge L. Turner dismissed the paternal grandparents' application to place the child on an Airport Watch List, finding it lacked merit. The Court permitted the mother and child to travel overseas as planned. In relation to time spent with the child, the Court made interim orders for the paternal grandparents to spend time with the child on the third Saturday of every second month, with further time to be agreed between the parties. Crucially, the Court ordered the paternal grandparents to file a fresh application within 42 days if they wished to pursue final orders regarding time spent with the child; failing this, the interim orders would become final.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the paternal grandparent’s Initiating Application filed on 3 December 2015 is hereby summarily dismissed.

2.

That forthwith the child X (who may also be recorded as X) born (omitted) 2013 be removed from the Airport Watch List.

3.

That the mother MS DUNNE born (omitted) 1987 and the child be permitted to travel outside the Commonwealth of Australia from 21 April 2016 to 16 May 2016.

4.

That commencing Saturday 21 May 2016 the paternal grandparents spend time with the child on the third Saturday of every second month from 9:00am to 5:00pm with changeover to occur at McDonald's (omitted) and that time occur with the child at other such times as can be agreed upon between the paternal grandparents and the mother.

5.

That the paternal grandparents file and serve within forty-two (42) days from the date hereof a fresh Initiating Application in respect to the spend time with arrangements only with respect to the child.

6.

That in the event that the paternal grandparents choose not to commence proceedings in accordance with Order (5) then the spend time with Order as provided for in Order (4) shall, upon the expiration of forty-two (42) days from the date hereof, become Final Orders and will issue as such from the Court.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.