Auscoal Services Pty Ltd; AUSCOAL Superannuation Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 5615


[2014] FWCA 5615
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Auscoal Services Pty Ltd; AUSCOAL Superannuation Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8500)

AUSCOAL GROUP ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2017

Banking finance and insurance industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 11 SEPTEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the AUSCOAL Group Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Auscoal Services Pty Ltd & AUSCOAL Superannuation Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the AUSCOAL Group Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with four Employee Bargaining Representatives and is to cover 125 employees who are engaged by the applicant in clerical, administrative and services roles. It does not cover management and professionally qualified employees who are engaged through individual contract arrangements. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 8 November 2013, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place 15 and 22 July 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a secure online survey, 57 of the 67 employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 31 July 2014, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Ms M Baker, Head of People & Culture, identified the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2010 [MA000019] and the Clerical and Administrative Employees (State) Award [AN120664] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Ms Bakersaid that the Agreement provides for a number of conditions that are in excess of, or are more beneficial than the terms of the relevant reference instruments and that there are no less beneficial terms. The Agreement provides for a uniform allowance, a birthday bonus and paid parental leave. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 18 and 19 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 20 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.

[4] At a hearing of the application on 15 August 2014, Ms M Baker appeared for the applicant and Mr P Muldoon appeared in his capacity as an Employee Bargaining Representative. All four Employee Bargaining Representatives had filed Declarations in relation to the application (Form 18A) supporting the approval of the Agreement. Ms Baker outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. She explained that rates of pay are reviewed by 15 August of each year and that this review took into account individual performance. All employees who were eligible to have their salary reviewed receive at least a CPI increase. Mr Muldoon supported the submissions of Ms Baker.

[5] Having heard the parties’ submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. While I note that the title clause of the Agreement (cl 2) sets out the name of the Agreement as being the AUSCOAL Enterprise Agreement 2011 - 2014, Mr Muldoon brought this error to my attention and I have amended it.Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the AUSCOAL Group Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017. Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 22 August 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 31 March 2017.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE409640  PR554369>

Details
AGLC
Auscoal Services Pty Ltd; AUSCOAL Superannuation Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5615
Case
[2014] FWCA 5615
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves Auscoal Services Pty Ltd and AUSCOAL Superannuation Pty Ltd, which have brought an application for the approval of the AUSCOAL Group Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 before the Fair Work Commission. The primary issue at hand is the approval of the terms and conditions set out in the agreement, which includes provisions related to wages, working hours, leave, and other employment-related matters.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly concerning procedural fairness and the protection of employees' rights. The Commission had to consider whether the agreement had been fairly negotiated, if the employees' interests had been adequately represented, and whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees.

In reaching its decision, the Commission examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated, the nature of the provisions, and the evidence provided by both parties. The Commission found that the agreement had been fairly negotiated and that the employees' interests were adequately represented. The Commission also determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. Consequently, the Commission approved the AUSCOAL Group Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.

As a result of the decision, the Fair Work Commission approved the AUSCOAL Group Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017, thereby formalising the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the agreement. This approval ensures that the agreement will be legally binding and enforceable, providing clarity and certainty for both the employers and employees involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.