Aurum Vale Pty Ltd v Struber & Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 9 min read

LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Aurum Vale Pty Ltd v Struber & Anor [2018] QLC 19
PARTIES: Aurum Vale Pty Ltd
(applicant)
v
Stephen Roy Struber
(respondent)
and
Diane Rose Wilson-Struber
(respondent)
FILE NO: MRA708-17
DIVISION: General division
PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation payable for renewal of a mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 29 June 2018
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD ON: Submissions closed 25 May 2018
HEARD AT: Heard on the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR:

GJ Smith

ORDERS:

1.   In respect of ML 5102 compensation is determined in the total sum of $72.00 per annum.

2.   The miner pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amount set out in order 1 within one months from notification of the renewal  of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

CATCHWORDS:

MINING LEASE – grant – determination of compensation – absence of expert or valuation evidence – referral documents – applicant’s submissions only – use of Court judgments for determination purposes

Mineral Resources Act 1989 s 279(1), s 281, s 281(1), s 281(3)(a), s 281(4)

Public Trustee Act 1978 Part 7

Baldwin v Struber [2012] QLC 56 considered

Eacham Abrasive Blasting Pty Ltd v Gundersen & Anor [2014] QLC 38 – considered
Fisher v Struber & Anor [2008] QLC 102 – considered
Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76 – followed

Goldhounds Exploration and Mining Pty Ltd v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 65 – cited
Pavey & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC – cited

Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd (1998) 19 QLCR 297 at 315 –applied

APPEARANCES: Not applicable
  1. This case concerns a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 279A of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation arising from the renewal of Mining Lease 5102 (ML 5102).

Background

  1. The applicant, Aurum Vale Pty Ltd (the miner) seeks the renewal of ML 5102 on land owned by the respondents Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber (the landowners). The land known as Palmerville Station is more particularly described as Lot 14 on SP 250040 is situated within the Mareeba Shire local government area and is used for grazing purposes. The mining lease area comprises of 5.3ha and a 0.48ha access area.

  1. The landowners are currently serving a period of imprisonment[1] and consequently their address for service is:

C/- PUBLIC TRUSTEE
PO BOX 656
CAIRNS QLD 4871

[1]Public Trustee Act 1978, Part 7.

  1. The relevant Land Court reference and tenure details are set out below:

Court reference Tenure ID Area Term Lease purpose
MRA708-17 5102 5.3ha 10 years Gold

Relevant legislation

  1. Section 279(1) of the MRA requires that compensation be settled before the grant or renewal of a mining lease is set out below:

279 Compensation to be settled before grant or renewal of mining lease

(1)       A mining lease…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Aurum Vale Pty Ltd v Struber & Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] QLC 19
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Aurum Vale Pty Ltd, the mining lease holder, sought a determination of compensation payable to the landowners under the Mining Act 1978 (Qld) for the mining lease ML 5102. The landowners did not participate in the proceeding. The matter was heard by Justice Byrne of the Queensland Land Court. The key issue for the court was the amount of compensation payable for the mining lease, in the absence of expert or valuation evidence. The only evidence provided was the applicant's submissions, which were largely based on previous court judgments.

The court noted that the Mining Act required the compensation to be fair and reasonable having regard to the circumstances of the case. Given the absence of evidence from either party, the court relied on its previous judgments and the referral documents. It determined that the compensation payable was $72.00 per annum, which was consistent with previous judgments for similar mining leases. The court found that this amount was fair and reasonable compensation for the use of the land for mining purposes.

The court ordered that the compensation payable for the mining lease ML 5102 was $72.00 per annum. The miner was required to pay the compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners within one month of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 5102 compensation is determined in the total sum of $72.00 per annum.

2. The miner pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amount set out in order 1 within one months from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.