Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Turnbull (No 2)
Case
•
[2016] QSC 24
•22 February 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Turnbull (No 2) [2016] QSC 24
[2016] QSC 24
22 February 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The respondent, Gary Une Turnbull, had been sentenced to 13 years imprisonment for three counts of rape following a series of ten sexual assaults against women who were strangers to him. He had been detained under a continuing detention order pursuant to the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) at the time of his full-time release date. The question before the court was whether the respondent should remain detained under a continuing detention order or be released on a supervision order, and if the latter, what conditions should be imposed.
The court determined that the respondent should be released subject to a supervision order. Two psychiatrists now considered that the respondent's risk of future sexual violence was moderate and that the risk could be reduced with the imposition of a supervision order. The court was satisfied that the proposed conditions in the supervision order were appropriate to ensure the adequate protection of the community. The court also considered it necessary to provide a transcript of the evidence of the psychiatrists to relevant Corrective Service officers. The court concluded that the duration of the supervision order should be five years, in line with the psychiatrists' recommendation.
The court's final orders were that the decision of Boddice J that the respondent was a serious danger to the community in the absence of an order under Division 3 of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) was affirmed. The continuing detention order made by Boddice J was rescinded. The respondent was to be subject to a supervision order containing the conditions set out in Annexure A until 22 February 2021.
The court determined that the respondent should be released subject to a supervision order. Two psychiatrists now considered that the respondent's risk of future sexual violence was moderate and that the risk could be reduced with the imposition of a supervision order. The court was satisfied that the proposed conditions in the supervision order were appropriate to ensure the adequate protection of the community. The court also considered it necessary to provide a transcript of the evidence of the psychiatrists to relevant Corrective Service officers. The court concluded that the duration of the supervision order should be five years, in line with the psychiatrists' recommendation.
The court's final orders were that the decision of Boddice J that the respondent was a serious danger to the community in the absence of an order under Division 3 of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) was affirmed. The continuing detention order made by Boddice J was rescinded. The respondent was to be subject to a supervision order containing the conditions set out in Annexure A until 22 February 2021.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Supervision Order
-
Dangerous Sexual Offender
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
1
R v Turnbull
[2013] QCA 374
Attorney-General (Qld) v Turnbull
[2014] QSC 132
Turnbull v Attorney-General
[2015] QCA 54