Atkinson and Anor v Van Uden

Case

[2020] QCAT 259

18 March 2020


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Atkinson and Anor v Van Uden [2020] QCAT 259 [2020] QCAT 259 18 March 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Terrance Atkinson and Leonie Atkinson, filed an application against the respondent, Marinus Hendrikus van Uden, in relation to alleged negligent construction work on a property they purchased. The dispute was heard and determined by the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT). The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicants could recover damages for the respondent's alleged negligent construction work, given that no enforceable contract existed between the parties. Additionally, the Tribunal had to determine the appropriate measure of damages for the alleged negligent construction work.

The Tribunal found that, despite the absence of an enforceable contract, the applicants could still recover damages for the respondent's negligent construction work. This finding was based on the principle that a party may recover damages for negligently inflicted loss, even in the absence of a contractual relationship. The Tribunal also held that the measure of damages should be assessed based on the cost of rectifying the alleged negligent construction work. Ultimately, the Tribunal awarded the applicants $22,439.00 in damages against the respondent, to be paid within 21 days of the decision.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Contract Law

Legal Concepts

  • Breach of Contract

  • Damages

  • Performance of Work

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

22

Gilby v Holstein [2025] QCAT 417
McGeoch v Harrison [2024] QCAT 314
Cases Cited

7

Statutory Material Cited

2