Atkins and Milburn

Case [2013] FCCA 2202


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

ATKINS & MILBURN [2013] FCCA 2202
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Contravention of parenting orders by father – mother alleged that father fails to see children – father asserts parenting order is unenforceable – application dismissed – costs.

Legislation:  

Family Law Act1975 (Cth)

Bale-Sutch & Bale-Sutch (No. 2) (2007) FamCA 590
Applicant: MS ATKINS
Respondent: MR MILBURN
File Number: NCC 550 of 2007
Judgment of: Judge Coakes
Hearing date: 15 November 2013
Date of Last Submission: 15 November 2013
Delivered at: Newcastle
Delivered on: 15 November 2013

REPRESENTATION

Solicitor for the Applicant: Ms Brooks
Solicitors for the Applicant: Legal Aid NSW
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr Butterworth
Solicitors for the Respondent: Schofield Muir Lawyers

ORDERS

  1. The Orders are made in accordance with the terms of settlement handed up in Court today and marked with the letter “A” and attached herein.

  2. The Solicitor for the Applicant is to file a clean certified typescript of the Terms of Settlement to be placed on the court file within forty eight (48) hours of today by email.

  3. The father’s application for costs for today is refused.

  4. The application for contravention filed by the mother on 11 March 2013 is dismissed.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Atkins & Milburn is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AT NEWCASTLE

NCC 550 of 2007

MS ATKINS

Applicant

And

MR MILBURN

Respondent

EX TEMPORE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Edited from the Transcript)

  1. In these proceedings, the mother brings an application for contravention asserting that the father did not spend time with the children the subject of these proceedings.  There are three children  X born (omitted) 2001, he is now 12 years and 2 months of age, and twin girls, Y, born (omitted), and Z, born the same day.  They are now 8 years and 9 months of age.  On 9 November 2012, final orders were made by consent which discharged the previous orders. 

  2. The later orders – the current orders – provide that the parties have joint parental responsibility for all three children.  The children live with their mother and the children spend time with their father by agreement but failing agreement, as it is then set out in order 4.1:  During New South Wales school terms, from 6 December 2012, every fourth week from the conclusion of school on the Thursday until the commencement of school on the following Monday, and each fourth week in the same fashion. 

  3. Order 4.2 provides: for one week of the New South Wales school holidays, at the conclusion of the holidays at the end of terms 1 or 2 or 3 as the father may nominate by giving six weeks’ notice to the mother.  And order 4.3: for two weeks in the term 4 Christmas school holidays and defined as the third and fourth week in odd-numbered years and the first two weeks in even-numbered year.  And order 4.4:  on…

Continue reading Atkins and Milburn

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Atkins and Milburn [2013] FCCA 2202
Case
[2013] FCCA 2202
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Atkins and Milburn*, heard before Judge Coakes, the dispute concerned applications relating to parenting orders. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond its relation to parenting orders, is not detailed in the provided text.

The court was required to determine the applications before it, which included an application for contravention filed by the mother and an application for costs by the father. The ultimate resolution of these applications was to be based on terms of settlement agreed to by the parties.

The court made orders in accordance with the terms of settlement presented by the parties. The solicitor for the applicant was directed to file a clean certified typescript of these terms within 48 hours. The father's application for costs for the day was refused, and the mother's application for contravention was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Orders are made in accordance with the terms of settlement handed up in Court today and marked with the letter “A” and attached herein.

2.

The Solicitor for the Applicant is to file a clean certified typescript of the Terms of Settlement to be placed on the court file within forty eight (48) hours of today by email.

3.

The father’s application for costs for today is refused.

4.

The application for contravention filed by the mother on 11 March 2013 is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.